§

In the Matter of Castro

14 I&N Dec. 492 (B.I.A. 1973)
In the Matter of Castro

8 Cited authorities

  1. LEE FOOK CHUEY v. IMMIGRATION NATURALIZATION

    439 F.2d 244 (9th Cir. 1971)   Cited 26 times
    In Lee Fook Chuey, supra, we stated the essence of the qualitative/quantitative distinction thusly: "[q]uantitative restrictions in the immigration laws serve to limit the number of immigrants (e. g., quota restrictions) while qualitative restrictions are intended to exclude those who are mentally, morally or physically unfit or undesirable."

  2. Gooch v. Clark

    433 F.2d 74 (9th Cir. 1970)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that "green card commuters" can be lawfully admitted for permanent residence despite physically residing in Canada or Mexico and crossing the border to work

  3. Castro-Guerrero v. Immigration Nat. Serv

    515 F.2d 615 (5th Cir. 1975)   Cited 8 times
    In Castro-Guerrero v. INS, 515 F.2d 615 (5th Cir. 1965) this court interpreted Reid to require that § 1182(a)(20) (invalid visa) could not be a ground that would allow the use of the forgiveness section.

  4. Castro-Guerrero v. Immigration Natural. Serv

    503 F.2d 964 (5th Cir. 1974)   Cited 2 times

    No. 74-1073. Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I. November 11, 1974. Sam Williamson, Houston, Tex., for petitioner. William B. Saxbe, Atty. Gen., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Anthony J. P. Farris, U.S. Atty., Houston, Tex., Troy A. Adams, Jr., District Director, Immig. Nat. Service, New Orleans, La., John L. Murphy, Chief, Crim. Div., Robert P. Trout, Atty., Criminal Div., Dept

  5. GAMERO v. IMMIGRATION NAT. SERV., LA DIST

    367 F.2d 123 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 5 times

    No. 20137. September 6, 1966. Rehearing Denied October 25, 1966. John F. Sheffield, Norman B. Silver, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant. Manuel L. Real, U.S. Atty., Frederick M. Brosio, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Chief, Civ. Div., Jacqueline L. Weiss, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees. Before CHAMBERS, JERTBERG, and ELY, Circuit Judges. ELY, Circuit Judge: Appellant is an alien who attacks an order of exclusion and deportation issued by a Special Inquiry Officer of the Immigration and

  6. Santos v. U.S. Immigration and Nat. Serv

    421 F.2d 1303 (9th Cir. 1970)   Cited 2 times

    No. 23160. February 13, 1970. Norman Stiller (argued), of Faulkner, Sheehan Wiseman, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant. David R. Urdan (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Cecil F. Poole, U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., Stephen M. Suffin, Atty., I.N.S., San Francisco, Cal., John N. Mitchell, Atty. Gen. of the U.S., Washington, D.C., for appellee. Before MADDEN, Judge of the United States Court of Claims; MERRILL and BROWNING, Circuit Judges. Senior Judge, United States Court of Claims, sitting by designation

  7. United States v. Day

    21 F.2d 307 (2d Cir. 1927)   Cited 19 times
    In Lesto v. Day, 21 F.2d 307 (2d Cir. 1927), the court concluded that in order for a visit abroad to be considered temporary, an immigrant must maintain a domicile in the United States and must show an intention to return to the United States in a short time.

  8. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,155 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable