In the Matter of Castellon

10 Cited authorities

  1. Ahrens v. Rojas

    292 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1961)   Cited 23 times

    No. 18955. June 30, 1961. Paul E. Gifford, Asst. U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., Douglas P. Lillis, Regional Counsel, I. N. Service, Richmond, Va., for appellant. Monroe Gelb, Miami, Fla., for appellee. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, RIVES, Circuit Judge, and DE VANE, District Judge. RIVES, Circuit Judge. In an action brought under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2201, and Section 10 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1009, the district court entered a final judgment that the plaintiff-appellee

  2. United States v. Murff

    260 F.2d 610 (2d Cir. 1958)   Cited 23 times
    In United States ex rel. Paktorovics v. Murff, 260 F.2d 610 (2d Cir. 1958), the court found that while the President alone lacked authority to create a legally enforceable right to enter this country, nonetheless an immigrant who travelled here upon an invitation issued "pursuant to the announced foreign policy of the United States as formulated by the President" and who was detained at Ellis Island was at the least entitled to a hearing before revocation of parole.
  3. Conceiro v. Marks

    360 F. Supp. 454 (S.D.N.Y. 1973)   Cited 4 times
    In Conceiro v. Marks, 360 F. Supp. 454 (S.D.N.Y. 1973) (Wyatt, J.), habeas corpus relief was denied because the court could find no abuse of discretion in the district director's denial of parole to an excludable political asylum applicant.
  4. Sui Fung Luk v. Rosenberg

    271 F. Supp. 485 (C.D. Cal. 1967)   Cited 2 times

    Civ. No. 67-621. June 22, 1967. Amended Order August 23, 1967. Kwan, Cohen Lum, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Wm. Matthew Byrne, Jr., U.S. Atty., Frederick M. Brosio, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Chief Civil Division and Carolyn M. Reynolds, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. DECISION, FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, ORDER and STIPULATED AMENDED ORDER HAUK, District Judge. FACTS Petitioner, a native and citizen of China, arrived in the United States as a member of the crew

  5. Section 1158 - Asylum

    8 U.S.C. § 1158   Cited 10,645 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding a "pattern or practice" of persecution requires it be "systemic, pervasive, or organized"
  6. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,893 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"
  7. Section 1225 - Inspection by immigration officers; expedited removal of inadmissible arriving aliens; referral for hearing

    8 U.S.C. § 1225   Cited 1,295 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Setting standard for credible fear as "a significant possibility, taking into account the ... statements made by the alien ... and such other facts as are known to the officer, that the alien could establish eligibility for asylum"
  8. Section 1253 - Penalties related to removal

    8 U.S.C. § 1253   Cited 1,132 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Establishing an exception to withholding for a dangerous alien who has been convicted of a "particularly serious crime," defined to include an "aggravated felony"
  9. Section 1184 - Admission of nonimmigrants

    8 U.S.C. § 1184   Cited 618 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Creating exceptions to caps, including separate quota of 20,000 for nonimmigrants with master's or higher degree
  10. Section 236.3 - Processing, detention, and release of alien minors

    8 C.F.R. § 236.3   Cited 47 times

    (a)Generally. (1) DHS treats all minors and unaccompanied alien children (UACs) in its custody with dignity, respect and special concern for their particular vulnerability. (2) The provisions of this section apply to all minors in the legal custody of DHS, including minors who are subject to the mandatory detention provisions of the INA and applicable regulations, to the extent authorized by law. (b)Definitions. For the purposes of this section: (1)Minor means any alien who has not attained eighteen