§

In the Matter of Carballe

19 I&N Dec. 357 (B.I.A. 1986)
In the Matter of Carballe

12 Cited authorities

  1. INS v. Bagamasbad

    429 U.S. 24 (1976)   Cited 769 times
    Holding that the BIA is "not required to make findings on issues the decision of which is unnecessary to the results [it] reach[es]."

  2. INS v. Rios-Pineda

    471 U.S. 444 (1985)   Cited 187 times
    Holding that the BIA may discount evidence of seven years' presence in its assessment of eligibility for suspension when presence was maintained through meritless appeals

  3. Zardui-Quintana v. Richard

    768 F.2d 1213 (11th Cir. 1985)   Cited 149 times
    In Zardui-Quintana v. Richard, 768 F.2d 1213 (11th Cir. 1985), the Eleventh Circuit pointed out that a request for a judicial stay of deportation is akin to and should be treated as a request for injunctive relief.

  4. Crespo-Gomez v. Richard

    780 F.2d 932 (11th Cir. 1986)   Cited 21 times
    In Crespo-Gomez, we held that "the fact that the alien has committed a particularly serious crime makes the alien dangerous within the meaning of the statute."

  5. Corona-Palomera v. Imm. and Nat. Service

    661 F.2d 814 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 20 times
    Finding that unrebutted birth certificates from Mexico in the respondent's names were sufficient evidence to establish alienage

  6. United States v. Rebon-Delgado

    467 F.2d 11 (9th Cir. 1972)   Cited 4 times
    Involving the admissibility of "certain documents from the official file of the Immigration and Naturalization Service bearing his name"

  7. Valeros v. Immigration Naturalization Serv

    387 F.2d 921 (7th Cir. 1967)   Cited 5 times

    No. 16087. November 28, 1967. Samuel D. Myers, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Edward V. Hanrahan, U.S. Atty., John Peter Lulinski, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before KNOCH, KILEY and FAIRCHILD, Circuit Judges. KILEY, Circuit Judge. A Special Inquiry Officer of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (Service) found petitioner subject to deportation, granted her the privilege of voluntary departure, but ordered her deported should she not depart voluntarily. The Board of Immigration Appeals

  8. Vlisidis v. Holland

    245 F.2d 812 (3d Cir. 1957)   Cited 10 times
    In Vlisidis v. Holland, 3 Cir., 245 F.2d 812, at page 814, Circuit Judge Hastie said: "Actually, it was necessary to show only the single fact that the respondent was an alien, for, once that is proved, the legislative scheme requires the alien to justify his presence within the United States. 66 Stat. 234, 8 U.S.C. § 1361."

  9. Section 1158 - Asylum

    8 U.S.C. § 1158   Cited 10,412 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding a "pattern or practice" of persecution requires it be "systemic, pervasive, or organized"

  10. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,711 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  11. Section 236.3 - Processing, detention, and release of alien minors

    8 C.F.R. § 236.3   Cited 46 times

    (a)Generally. (1) DHS treats all minors and unaccompanied alien children (UACs) in its custody with dignity, respect and special concern for their particular vulnerability. (2) The provisions of this section apply to all minors in the legal custody of DHS, including minors who are subject to the mandatory detention provisions of the INA and applicable regulations, to the extent authorized by law. (b)Definitions. For the purposes of this section: (1)Minor means any alien who has not attained eighteen

  12. Section 208.10 - Failure to appear at an interview before an asylum officer or failure to follow requirements for fingerprint processing

    8 C.F.R. § 208.10   Cited 45 times
    Requiring the applicant to demonstrate "exceptional circumstances" to excuse her failure to appear