In the Matter of C____ T____ P

9 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Flores-Rodriguez

    237 F.2d 405 (2d Cir. 1956)   Cited 36 times
    Discussing the earlier statutory term "constitutional psychopathic inferiority," but suggesting that it was largely interchangeable with "psychopathic personality"
  2. Corrado v. United States

    227 F.2d 780 (6th Cir. 1955)   Cited 29 times
    In Corrado v. United States, 227 F.2d 780 (6th Cir. 1955), the defendant denied on his application that he had ever been arrested when, in fact, he had been arrested fifteen times and convicted twice.
  3. United States v. Shaughnessy

    186 F.2d 580 (2d Cir. 1951)   Cited 25 times

    No. 132, Docket 21882. Argued December 15, 1950. Decided January 29, 1951. Appellant is an alien seaman. On the basis of an application which he signed and to which he swore before the U.S. Vice-Consul at Helsinki, Finland, on September 2, 1947, the Vice-Consul granted appellant a visa on October 1, 1947. Under that visa, appellant subsequently entered the United States as a permanent resident. In deportation proceedings, after a hearing, the examiner found that "the visa which was issued October

  4. Ablett v. Brownell

    240 F.2d 625 (D.C. Cir. 1957)   Cited 12 times

    No. 13243. Argued June 12, 1956. Decided January 10, 1957. Mr. David Carliner, with whom Mr. Jack Wasserman, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant. Mr. John W. Kern, III, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Mr. Oliver Gasch, U.S. Atty., Mr. Lewis Carroll and Mrs. Kitty Blair Frank, Asst. U.S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee. Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U.S. Atty., at the time record was filed, and Milton Eisenberg, Asst. U.S. Atty., also entered appearances for appellee. Before WILBUR K. MILLER

  5. United States v. Day

    34 F.2d 920 (2d Cir. 1929)   Cited 40 times
    In United States ex rel. Iorio v. Day, 2 Cir., 34 F.2d 920, we went so far as to hold even selling whisky in violation of the Volstead Act was not a crime involving "moral turpitude" as those words are used in the Immigration Act.
  6. Duran-Garcia v. Neelly

    246 F.2d 287 (5th Cir. 1957)   Cited 6 times

    No. 16610. July 16, 1957. Albert Armendariz, El Paso, Tex., for appellant. Holvey Williams, Asst. U.S. Atty., El Paso, Tex., for appellee. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and TUTTLE and CAMERON, Circuit Judges. TUTTLE, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court decreeing that appellant is entitled to no relief from an order of deportation. Except as indicated specifically below the facts are not in dispute. Appellant is a young woman of Mexican birth and nationality whose

  7. In re Field's Petition

    159 F. Supp. 144 (S.D.N.Y. 1958)   Cited 5 times

    February 13, 1958. Edward L. Dubroff, Brooklyn, N.Y., for petitioner. Paul W. Williams, U.S. Atty., S.D. New York, New York City, David N. Ilchert, U.S. Naturalization Examiner, Long Island City, N Y, of counsel, for Immigration and Naturalization Service. DAWSON, District Judge. The petitioner has filed a petition for naturalization which is opposed by the Immigration and Naturalization Service. The Court finds that the petitioner entered the United States on December 22, 1947, at Miami, Florida

  8. United States v. Chandler

    152 F. Supp. 169 (D. Md. 1957)   Cited 2 times

    Civ. No. 7447. June 13, 1957. Leon H.A. Pierson, U.S. Atty., and James H. Langrall, Asst. U.S. Atty., Baltimore, Md., Maurice A. Roberts, Atty., Crim.Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., on the brief, for plaintiff. Joseph Forer, Washington, D.C., and Harold Buchman, Baltimore, Md., for defendant. THOMSEN, Chief Judge. This is an action under sec. 340(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1451(a), to revoke defendant's naturalization on the ground that it was obtained

  9. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,158 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable