§
In the Matter of C

4 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Falcone

    311 U.S. 205 (1940)   Cited 338 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Falcone, the Supreme Court held that mere knowledge by the seller that the buyer intended to use the commodity unlawfully, without more, is not enough to support a conspiracy conviction.

  2. United States v. Kissel

    218 U.S. 601 (1910)   Cited 288 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In United States v. Kissel, 218 U.S. 601 (1910) we held that antitrust conspiracies may continue in time beyond the original conspiratorial agreement until either the conspiracy's objectives are abandoned or succeed.

  3. Ponzi v. Ward

    7 F. Supp. 736 (D. Mass. 1934)   Cited 9 times

    No. 5201. July 30, 1934. Peter Maggio, of Everett, Mass., for plaintiff. Francis J.W. Ford, U.S. Atty., and Arthur J.B. Cartier, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of Boston, Mass., for defendant. BREWSTER, District Judge. This is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus heard upon the merits before writ issued. By agreement of parties, it was submitted upon the record in the Immigration Bureau. The petitioner is held upon a deportation warrant issued September 28, 1927. The reason for the delay in executing the

  4. United States v. Marshall

    4 F. Supp. 965 (W.D. Pa. 1933)   Cited 2 times

    No. 72. April 7, 1933. Jacob Seligsohn and William D. Grimes, both of Pittsburgh, Pa., for Franjo Borich. Louis E. Graham, U.S. Atty., and Lloyd W. Bryan, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of Pittsburgh, Pa., for respondent. GIBSON, District Judge. The relator, Franjo Borich, was held by William H. Marshall, district director of immigration, upon a departmental warrant ordering his deportation. Pursuant to his petition a writ of habeas corpus issued upon the district director, who has filed his return, wherein