§
In the Matter of C

14 Cited authorities

  1. Scales v. United States

    367 U.S. 203 (1961)   Cited 395 times
    Holding that a statute criminalizing membership in an organization offends due process if it "impermissibly imputes guilt to an individual merely on the basis of his associations and sympathies, rather than because of some concrete personal involvement in criminal conduct"

  2. Galvan v. Press

    347 U.S. 522 (1954)   Cited 389 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while aliens may receive procedural due process, the court's ability to review the substantive policy of immigration statutes is limited to review for rationality

  3. Mesarosh v. United States

    352 U.S. 1 (1956)   Cited 289 times
    Holding that "new evidence which is merely ... impeaching is not ... an adequate basis for the grant of a new trial"

  4. Communist Party v. Control Board

    351 U.S. 115 (1956)   Cited 72 times
    In Communist Party the Court remanded the case to the Board with directions to resolve the charges of taint, and to make a fresh determination on the merits, if taint were found.

  5. Rowoldt v. Perfetto

    355 U.S. 115 (1957)   Cited 49 times
    Holding that record was "too insubstantial" to demonstrate "meaningful association" required by INA for deportation

  6. Foster v. United States

    282 F.2d 222 (10th Cir. 1960)   Cited 30 times
    In Foster v. United States, 282 F.2d 222, 224 (10th Cir. 1960), we stated, "[I]n the last analysis the trial court is the governor of the trial with a duty to assure its proper conduct and the limits of cross examination necessarily lie within its discretion.

  7. United States v. Farley

    292 F.2d 789 (2d Cir. 1961)   Cited 4 times

    No. 422, Docket 24577. Argued June 21, 1961. Decided July 21, 1961. Bella V. Dodd, of Dodd, Cardiello Blair, New York City (Charles Leo Farley, defendant-appellant, pro se, on the brief), for defendant-appellant. James M. Catterson, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., E.D.N.Y., Brooklyn, N Y (Joseph P. Hoey, U.S. Atty., Brooklyn, N.Y., on the brief), for appellee. Before CLARK and SMITH, Circuit Judges, and DAWSON, District Judge. CLARK, Circuit Judge. Defendant appeals from a conviction for robbing the Bethpage

  8. Carlisle v. Rogers

    262 F.2d 19 (D.C. Cir. 1958)   Cited 4 times

    No. 13711. Argued April 16, 1957. Decided May 15, 1958. As Amended November 24, 1958. Mr. David Rein, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Joseph Forer, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Harold D. Rhynedance, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U.S. Atty., and Lewis Carroll, Asst. U.S. Atty., were on the brief, for appellee. Mr. John W. Kern, III, Asst. U.S. Atty., also entered an appearance for appellee. Before BAZELON, WASHINGTON and DANAHER, Circuit Judges. PER

  9. Carlisle v. Brownell

    149 F. Supp. 855 (D.D.C. 1957)   Cited 1 times

    No. 4398-53. January 31, 1957. Forer Rein, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff. Oliver Gasch, U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., for defendant. RIZLEY, District Judge. Plaintiff has been ordered deported from the United States as an alien, who, within the provisions of Section 22, Internal Security Act of 1950, was a member of the Communist Party of the United States during certain specified years. The administrative proceedings resulting in the final order of deportation commenced on October 31, 1950, when

  10. Swafford v. United States

    25 F.2d 581 (8th Cir. 1928)   Cited 14 times
    In Swafford, supra, the court allowed a witness to state whether another witness' reputation for truth and veracity was good or bad. Further than that the witness was not allowed to go.

  11. Section 1254 - Repealed

    8 U.S.C. § 1254   Cited 1,132 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Describing suspension-of-deportation eligibility

  12. Section 2385 - Advocating overthrow of Government

    18 U.S.C. § 2385   Cited 282 times
    Prohibiting membership in organization advocating overthrow of United States government by force or violence