§
In the Matter of C

36 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Munsingwear

    340 U.S. 36 (1950)   Cited 1,385 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when a claim becomes moot while a case is pending on appeal the proper disposition is to vacate the judgment of the lower court and remand with instructions to dismiss

  2. Yates v. United States

    354 U.S. 298 (1957)   Cited 957 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a conviction must be reversed if the evidence in the record supports a legally impermissible ground as well as a legally permissible one and "it is impossible to tell which ground the jury selected"

  3. Galvan v. Press

    347 U.S. 522 (1954)   Cited 389 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while aliens may receive procedural due process, the court's ability to review the substantive policy of immigration statutes is limited to review for rationality

  4. Fishgold v. Sullivan Corp.

    328 U.S. 275 (1946)   Cited 485 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940 “is to be liberally construed for the benefit of those who left private life to serve their country in its hour of great need”

  5. Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Co.

    320 U.S. 661 (1944)   Cited 380 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Determining that defendant's antitrust counterclaim against plaintiff who had initiated patent-infringement lawsuit was permissive, not compulsory

  6. U.S. v. International Building Co.

    345 U.S. 502 (1953)   Cited 257 times
    Holding that Tax Court decisions based on stipulations are res judicata for the years they govern

  7. Tait v. Western Maryland Railway Co.

    289 U.S. 620 (1933)   Cited 299 times
    In Tait v. Western Maryland Railway, 289 U.S. 620, 53 S.Ct. 706, (1933), the plaintiff taxpayer had won a previous action against the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. The Court held that the defendant tax collector in Tait was bound by the prior judgment as a privy to the Commissioner, because the tax collector was an official acting under the government and the Commissioner.

  8. Southern Pacific Railr'd v. United States

    168 U.S. 1 (1897)   Cited 728 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Noting that the "general rule" of issue preclusion "is demanded by the very object for which civil courts have been established"

  9. Cromwell v. County of Sac

    94 U.S. 351 (1876)   Cited 1,575 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding for the purpose of res judicata that, because the two suits involved separate contracts, a prior suit for recovery of coupons attached to bonds did not involve the same claim as a later suit for recovery of later maturing coupons attached to the same bonds

  10. Norton v. Larney

    266 U.S. 511 (1925)   Cited 289 times

    APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 146. Submitted December 8, 1924. Decided January 5, 1925. 1. An averment in a bill to quiet title to a Creek Indian allotment that the plaintiff went into possession by authority of treaties between the Creek Nation and the United States and the laws of Congress dealing with the lands and individuals of the Creek Nation, is insufficient to show that the case arose under those laws and treaties. P. 513. 2. When a right to land set

  11. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,688 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status

  12. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,159 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

  13. Section 1451 - Revocation of naturalization

    8 U.S.C. § 1451   Cited 585 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Empowering the government to "institute proceedings in any district court of the United States in the judicial district in which the naturalized citizen may reside ... for the purpose of revoking and setting aside the order admitting such person to citizenship"

  14. Section 1001 to 1006 - Repealed

    8 U.S.C. § 1001 - 8 U.S.C. § 1006   Cited 74 times   1 Legal Analyses

    8 U.S.C. § 1001 to 1006 June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title IV, §403(a)(42), 66 Stat. 280, eff. Dec. 24, 1952 Section 1001, act Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 876, title III, §701, as added Mar. 27, 1942, ch. 199, title X, §1001, 56 Stat. 182; amended Dec. 22, 1944, ch. 662, §1, 58 Stat. 886; Dec. 28, 1945, ch. 590, §1(c)(1), 59 Stat. 658, related to exceptions from certain requirements of naturalization of persons serving in the armed forces during World War II. See section 1440 of this title. Section 1002, act Oct