IN THE MATTER OF BOWE

18 Cited authorities

  1. Francis v. Immigration Naturalization Serv

    532 F.2d 268 (2d Cir. 1976)   Cited 249 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "fundamental fairness" dictates that § 212(c) apply to resident aliens in deportation as well as exclusion proceedings
  2. Tapia-Acuna v. Immigration Natur. Serv

    640 F.2d 223 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 62 times
    Adopting the Francis rationale
  3. In re Yarn Processing Patent Validity

    498 F.2d 271 (5th Cir. 1974)   Cited 76 times
    Finding that the district court erred in disregarding "self-serving comments" that created a fact issue; noting that "[q]uestions of credibility should not normally be decided by means of summary judgment but should be left for the trier of fact"
  4. Castillo-Felix v. Immig. Naturalization Serv

    601 F.2d 459 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 53 times
    Holding that aliens who "are here for a temporary purpose" yet intend to remain in the country "violate the terms of their admission and are no longer here lawfully"
  5. Nicholas v. Immigration Naturalization Serv

    590 F.2d 802 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 46 times
    Holding that INS violated its own regulation in processing a non-citizen's request for immigration records
  6. Sotelo Mondragon v. Ilchert

    653 F.2d 1254 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 23 times
    Finding jurisdiction to review deportation order under INA section 106 and section 2241
  7. Hamid v. U.S. I. N. S

    538 F.2d 1389 (9th Cir. 1976)   Cited 16 times
    In Hamid, we reasoned that even if the petitioner's conduct did not itself qualify as trafficking, it "provided a sound basis to believe that petitioner was a 'trafficker'" Id. at 1391.
  8. Dunn v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

    499 F.2d 856 (9th Cir. 1974)   Cited 18 times

    No. 72-2463. June 27, 1974. Rehearing Denied August 15, 1974. William A. Herreras (argued), Ghitterman, Eskin Herreras, Santa Barbara, Cal., for petitioner-appellant. William D. Keller, U.S. Atty., Alan W. Peryam, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent-appellee. Before CHAMBERS and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and KING, District Judge. The Honorable Samuel P. King, United District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation. OPINION SAMUEL P. KING, District Judge: Petitioner

  9. Arias-Uribe v. Immig. Nat. Service

    466 F.2d 1198 (9th Cir. 1972)   Cited 19 times
    In Arias-Uribe, an alien faced deportation for a narcotics conviction under § 241(a)(11) — a ground that had long been established to correspond to the § 212(a)(23) ground of excludability.
  10. BOWE v. IMMIGRATION NATURALIZATION SERV

    597 F.2d 1158 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 7 times

    No. 78-1496. February 7, 1979. Revised Opinion April 23, 1979. Rehearing Denied June 4, 1979. Michael D. Finnegan, Simmons Ungar, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Philip P. Leadbetter, Trial Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Before CARTER, BRIGHT, and CHOY, Circuit Judges. The Honorable Myron H. Bright, United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation. CHOY, Circuit Judge: Bowe appeals from

  11. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,714 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"
  12. Section 1255 - Adjustment of status of nonimmigrant to that of person admitted for permanent residence

    8 U.S.C. § 1255   Cited 2,833 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Listing classes of nonimmigrants, such as students and tourists
  13. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,154 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable
  14. Section 1254 - Repealed

    8 U.S.C. § 1254   Cited 1,130 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Describing suspension-of-deportation eligibility