§

In the Matter of Bogart

15 I&N Dec. 552 (B.I.A. 1976)
In the Matter of Bogart

22 Cited authorities

  1. In re Ruffalo

    390 U.S. 544 (1968)   Cited 790 times
    Holding that a lawyer involved in disbarment proceedings is, like a criminal defendant, entitled to "fair notice of the charge," but never explaining how such notice can be provided

  2. Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners

    353 U.S. 232 (1957)   Cited 981 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a state cannot exclude a person from the practice of law based on failure to satisfy its standards of qualification "when there is no basis for their finding that he fails to meet these standards"

  3. Theard v. United States

    354 U.S. 278 (1957)   Cited 291 times
    Holding that the district court is not duty-bound to impose reciprocal discipline in all circumstances, especially when a long period of time has elapsed between the state-imposed discipline and the proposed reciprocal discipline in federal court

  4. Konigsberg v. State Bar

    353 U.S. 252 (1957)   Cited 238 times
    In Konigsberg v. State Bar of California, 353 U.S. 252, 256-258 (1957), for example, California argued that the California Supreme Court's order dismissing the petitioner's prayer for relief was based on an independent and adequate state ground: the requirements of a state procedural rule.

  5. Selling v. Radford

    243 U.S. 46 (1917)   Cited 244 times
    Setting forth similar criteria for the imposition of reciprocal discipline by the Supreme Court

  6. In re Isserman

    345 U.S. 286 (1953)   Cited 44 times

    ON RETURN TO RULE TO SHOW CAUSE. No. 5, Misc. Decided April 6, 1953. At the conclusion of the nine-months' trial of the eleven defendants whose convictions were affirmed by this Court in Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494, the Federal District Judge sentenced the defense attorneys, including respondent, to jail for contempt. The contemptuous acts consisted mainly of repetitious and insolent objections and arguments after the trial judge made rulings and ordered a halt to further arguments on the

  7. Thistlethwaite v. City of New York

    497 F.2d 339 (2d Cir. 1974)   Cited 52 times
    Distinguishing Lackawanna Police Benevolent Association, in part, on ground that "the plaintiff [there] had voluntarily chosen the state court as his initial forum"

  8. In re Bogart

    9 Cal.3d 743 (Cal. 1973)   Cited 36 times

    Docket No. L.A. 30064. July 25, 1973. COUNSEL Peter D. Bogart, in pro. per., for Petitioner. F. LaMar Forshee, Herbert M. Rosenthal and Ronald W. Stovitz for Respondent. OPINION THE COURT. This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar of California that petitioner be disbarred. Petitioner was admitted to practice in this state on September 11, 1962. In 1965, he was convicted in a court trial in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County of six counts of

  9. Bogart v. Reagan

    386 U.S. 211 (1967)   Cited 2 times

    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 1044, Misc. Decided February 27, 1967. Appeal dismissed. Peter D. Bogart, appellant, pro se. Warren M. Christopher for appellee State Bar of California. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The request for other relief is denied.

  10. Bogart v. Traynor

    385 U.S. 451 (1967)   Cited 2 times

    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 767, Misc. Decided January 9, 1967. Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. Appellant pro se. Warren M. Christopher for appellee State Bar of California. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. The request for other relief is also denied.

  11. Section 500 - Administrative practice; general provisions

    5 U.S.C. § 500   Cited 618 times   12 Legal Analyses

    (a) For the purpose of this section- (1) "agency" has the meaning given it by section 551 of this title; and (2) "State" means a State, a territory or possession of the United States including a Commonwealth, or the District of Columbia. (b) An individual who is a member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a State may represent a person before an agency on filing with the agency a written declaration that he is currently qualified as provided by this subsection and is authorized to

  12. Section 1.1 - Applicability

    8 C.F.R. § 1.1   Cited 158 times
    Providing that LPR status terminates upon the entry of a final order of removal

  13. Section 292.3 - Professional conduct for practitioners-Rules and procedures

    8 C.F.R. § 292.3   Cited 16 times
    Providing for sanctions against "a practitioner who is authorized to practice before DHS"