§

In the Matter of Becher

12 I&N Dec. 380 (B.I.A. 1967)
In the Matter of Becher

22 Cited authorities

  1. Schneider v. Rusk

    377 U.S. 163 (1964)   Cited 194 times
    In Schneider v. Rusk, 377 U.S. 163 (1964), the Government unsuccessfully attempted to justify a statutory inequality between naturalized and native-born citizens under the foreign relations power.

  2. Afroyim v. Rusk

    387 U.S. 253 (1967)   Cited 131 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Congress has no authority to revoke United States citizenship

  3. Perez v. Brownell

    356 U.S. 44 (1958)   Cited 82 times
    In Perez the contention that § 401(e) was penal in character was impliedly rejected by the Court's holding, based on legislative history totally different from that underlying §§ 401(j) and 349(a) (10), that voting in a political election in a foreign state "is regulable by Congress under its power to deal with foreign affairs."

  4. Kawakita v. United States

    343 U.S. 717 (1952)   Cited 91 times
    Affirming Kawakita v. United States, 190 F.2d 506, 527-28 (9th Cir. 1951)

  5. Commissioner v. Shamberg's Estate

    144 F.2d 998 (2d Cir. 1944)   Cited 54 times
    In Shamberg, the court concluded that the words "on behalf of" meant bonds issued by a state authority to carry out a public purpose where the latter is not named as an obligor.

  6. Stipa v. Dulles

    233 F.2d 551 (3d Cir. 1956)   Cited 11 times

    No. 11651. Argued November 18, 1955. Decided May 16, 1956. Filindo B. Masino, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant. W. Wilson White, U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee. Before BIGGS, KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. KALODNER, Circuit Judge. Giovanni Stipa appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania dismissing his complaint seeking a judgment declaring him to be a citizen of the United States. The complaint was filed under Section

  7. Dulles v. Katamoto

    256 F.2d 545 (9th Cir. 1958)   Cited 7 times
    Taking judicial notice of Japanese law

  8. Fletes-Mora v. Rogers

    160 F. Supp. 215 (S.D. Cal. 1958)   Cited 1 times

    No. 138-57. March 27, 1958. David C. Marcus, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff. Laughlin E. Waters, U.S. Atty., Richard A. Lavine, Burton C. Jacobson, Asst. U.S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants. MATHES, District Judge. Plaintiff again invokes the jurisdiction of this Court under 8 U.S.C.A. § 1503 seeking "a judgment declaring him to be a national of the United States * * *." See Fletes-Mora v. Brownell, 9 Cir., 1955, 231 F.2d 579. In his complaint plaintiff also seeks review, under § 10

  9. Kenji Kamada v. Dulles

    145 F. Supp. 457 (N.D. Cal. 1956)   Cited 2 times

    Civ. Nos. 32175, 32176, 32274, 32275. August 10, 1956. Mas Yonemura, Oakland, Cal., for plaintiffs. Charles Elmer Collett, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant. WEINFELD, District Judge. These are a series of cases brought respectively by four plaintiffs pursuant to Section 503 of the Nationality Act of 1940, 8 U.S.C.A. § 903, for a judgment declaring each plaintiff to be a national of the United States. Now 8 U.S.C.A. § 1503. All the plaintiffs were born in the United States of Japanese parents who

  10. Insogna v. Dulles

    116 F. Supp. 473 (D.D.C. 1953)   Cited 3 times

    Civ. A. No. 1446-51. November 18, 1953. Joseph J. Lyman, Washington, D.C. for plaintiff. Leo A. Rover, U.S. Atty., Joseph A. Rafferty, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C. for defendant. McLAUGHLIN, District Judge. This is an action brought under the provisions of Section 503 of the Nationality Act of 1940 for a declaratory judgment to establish that plaintiff is a citizen of the United States. 8 U.S.C. § 903 [Immigration and Nationality Act 1952, § 360, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1503]. The plaintiff was born in

  11. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,977 times   73 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  12. Section 1226 - Apprehension and detention of aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1226   Cited 3,242 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Ruling that no court may set aside an immigration judge's "discretionary judgment any action or decision . . . regarding the detention or release of any alien or the grant, revocation, or denial of bond or parole"

  13. Section 3121 - Definitions

    26 U.S.C. § 3121   Cited 695 times   45 Legal Analyses
    Excluding state employees

  14. Section 1481 - Loss of nationality by native-born or naturalized citizen; voluntary action; burden of proof; presumptions

    8 U.S.C. § 1481   Cited 255 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Providing that United States nationality may be lost by "voluntarily performing" certain acts "with the intention of relinquishing United States nationality"

  15. Section 1484 to 1487 - Repealed

    8 U.S.C. § 1484 - 8 U.S.C. § 1487   Cited 26 times

    8 U.S.C. § 1484 to 1487 Pub. L. 95-432, §2, Oct. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 1046 Section 1484, act June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title III, ch. 3, §352, 66 Stat. 269, related to loss of nationality by naturalized national by continuous residence for 3 years in the territory or foreign state of which the individual was a former national or in which his place of birth was situated or continuous residence for 5 years in any other foreign state or states. Section 1485, acts June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title III, ch. 3

  16. Section 617k - Definitions

    43 U.S.C. § 617k   Cited 2 times

    "Political subdivision" or "political subdivisions" as used in this subchapter shall be understood to include any State, irrigation or other district, municipality, or other governmental organization. "Reclamation law" as used in this subchapter shall be understood to mean that certain Act of Congress of the United States approved June 17, 1902, and the Acts amendatory thereof and supplemental thereto. "Maintenance" as used herein shall be deemed to include in each instance provision for keeping