In the Matter of Batten

9 Cited authorities

Williamson v. United States
332 F.2d 123 (5th Cir. 1964) Cited 64 times
In Williamson, in finding plain error, the court reviewed the entire record and found that the criminal cast to the defendant bank cashier's otherwise innocent (if negligent) conduct was based "entirely" upon the alleged accomplice's testimony.
Golden v. United States
318 F.2d 357 (1st Cir. 1963) Cited 35 times
Upholding jury instruction and noting that instruction stated proper test for intent to injure or defraud as "whether or not the bank was defrauded of something, defrauded of its right to have custody of [its] funds, the right of the bank to make its own decisions as to how these funds were to be used, and to act under other regulations promulgated in protection of banking"
United States v. Matot
146 F.2d 197 (2d Cir. 1944) Cited 67 times
In Matot, the wise Judge Learned Hand held that self-serving statements elicited during the testimony of a defendant were admissible unless excluded by some evidentiary rule, such as the hearsay rule.
Logsdon v. United States
253 F.2d 12 (6th Cir. 1958) Cited 40 times
In Logsdon v. United States, 253 F.2d 12 (6th Cir. 1958), the defendant Logsdon was tried for aiding, abetting and inducing co-defendant Barrett, acting as cashier of the bank, to willfully misapply bank funds.
Ramirez v. United States
318 F.2d 155 (9th Cir. 1963) Cited 23 times
Finding that the phrase "did willfully misapply" imports an intent to injure or defraud under section 656
Seals v. United States
221 F.2d 243 (8th Cir. 1955) Cited 24 times
No. 15107. April 5, 1955. Boyd Tackett, Texarkana, Ark., and W.S. Atkins, Hope, Ark. (Bobby Steel, Nashville, Ark., Ben Shaver, and Paul Jones, Texarkana, Ark., were with them on the brief), for appellant. Henry M. Britt, Asst. U.S. Atty., Fort Smith, Ark. (Charles W. Atkinson, U.S. Atty., Fayetteville, Ark., and Robert E. Johnson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Greenwood, Ark., were with him on the brief), for appellee. Before GARDNER, Chief Judge, and COLLET and VAN OOSTERHOUT, Circuit Judges. VAN OOSTERHOUT
Mercer v. Lence
96 F.2d 122 (10th Cir. 1938) Cited 15 times
No. 1606. April 12, 1938. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Utah; Tillman D. Johnson, Judge. Habeas corpus proceeding by John Lawrence Mercer against M.F. Lence, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Department of Labor, and the United States of America, to procure petitioner's release from custody for deportation to Canada. From an order discharging the writ and remanding petitioner to custody, petitioner appeals. Affirmed. Marshall Chapman
Section 1251 - Transferred
8 U.S.C. § 1251 Cited 2,154 times 1 Legal Analyses
Delineating crimes that make alien deportable
Section 656 - Theft, embezzlement, or misapplication by bank officer or employee
18 U.S.C. § 656 Cited 868 times 2 Legal Analyses
Criminalizing certain conduct by an individual who is “an officer, director, agent or employee of, or connected in any capacity with any Federal Reserve bank”

In the Matter of Batten

9 Cited authorities

In Williamson, in finding plain error, the court reviewed the entire record and found that the criminal cast to the defendant bank cashier's otherwise innocent (if negligent) conduct was based "entirely" upon the alleged accomplice's testimony.

In Matot, the wise Judge Learned Hand held that self-serving statements elicited during the testimony of a defendant were admissible unless excluded by some evidentiary rule, such as the hearsay rule.

In Logsdon v. United States, 253 F.2d 12 (6th Cir. 1958), the defendant Logsdon was tried for aiding, abetting and inducing co-defendant Barrett, acting as cashier of the bank, to willfully misapply bank funds.

Finding that the phrase "did willfully misapply" imports an intent to injure or defraud under section 656

Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

Criminalizing certain conduct by an individual who is “an officer, director, agent or employee of, or connected in any capacity with any Federal Reserve bank”