In the Matter of Barrera

19 Cited authorities

  1. INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca

    480 U.S. 421 (1987)   Cited 2,410 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the phrase "well-founded fear," which is also found in 8 U.S.C. § 1101, is ambiguous
  2. INS v. Abudu

    485 U.S. 94 (1988)   Cited 1,189 times
    Holding that the BIA may deny a motion to reopen if "the movant has not established a prima facie case for the underlying substantive relief sought"
  3. INS v. Stevic

    467 U.S. 407 (1984)   Cited 924 times
    Holding that to qualify for withholding of removal, an applicant must demonstrate a "clear probability" of persecution if removed
  4. INS v. Bagamasbad

    429 U.S. 24 (1976)   Cited 831 times
    Holding no requirement "to arrive at purely advisory findings and conclusions as to statutory eligibility" for immigration relief when application fails for other reasons
  5. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jong Ha Wang

    450 U.S. 139 (1981)   Cited 299 times
    Holding that where allegations are "unsupported by affidavit" they cannot support a motion to reopen because this would constitute a circumvention of the affidavit requirement in the regulations
  6. INS v. Phinpathya

    464 U.S. 183 (1984)   Cited 248 times
    Holding that thirty-two-year-old statute must still be given its plain meaning
  7. INS v. Rios-Pineda

    471 U.S. 444 (1985)   Cited 189 times
    Holding that the BIA may discount evidence of seven years' presence in its assessment of eligibility for suspension when presence was maintained through meritless appeals
  8. Keefe v. Massachusetts

    465 U.S. 1068 (1984)   Cited 97 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Declining to find fundamental right to child-parent privilege where "[n]either Congress nor the Legislature of any State has seen fit to adopt a rule granting [such] a privilege . . ."
  9. Balani v. Immigration Naturalization Serv

    669 F.2d 1157 (6th Cir. 1982)   Cited 137 times
    Holding that the BIA abuses its discretion if it denies a motion to reopen without providing a rational explanation
  10. Garcia-Mir v. Smith

    766 F.2d 1478 (11th Cir. 1985)   Cited 102 times
    Holding Attorney General need only assert a "`facially legitimate and bona fide'" reason for a parole decision (quoting Jean I, 727 F.2d at 977)
  11. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,712 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status
  12. Section 1158 - Asylum

    8 U.S.C. § 1158   Cited 10,672 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding a "pattern or practice" of persecution requires it be "systemic, pervasive, or organized"
  13. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,908 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"
  14. Section 1253 - Penalties related to removal

    8 U.S.C. § 1253   Cited 1,132 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Establishing an exception to withholding for a dangerous alien who has been convicted of a "particularly serious crime," defined to include an "aggravated felony"