§
IN THE MATTER OF BARK

9 Cited authorities

  1. Bark v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

    511 F.2d 1200 (9th Cir. 1975)   Cited 100 times
    Holding that the test for bona fide marriage is whether the couple "intend[ed] to establish a life together at the time they were married"

  2. Leviner v. Richardson

    443 F.2d 1338 (4th Cir. 1971)   Cited 63 times
    Holding improper the summary disposition of the district judge that administrative res judicata could not apply simply because there was no hearing in the prior relevant application

  3. Talanoa v. Immigration Naturalization Serv

    397 F.2d 196 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 15 times
    In Talanoa v. INS, 397 F.2d 196 (9th Cir. 1968), the court explained: "Petitioner had been eligible for the relief sought when he first applied for it. He became ineligible by virtue of the change in the law, to-wit, he became unable to obtain a labor certification pursuant to [the changed law]. It is settled that when the law is changed before a decision is handed down by an administrative agency, the agency must apply the new law."

  4. Campos v. U.S. INS

    402 F.2d 758 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 8 times
    In Campos v. U.S. Immigration Naturalization Service, 402 F.2d 758 (9th Cir. 1968), this court interpreted Section 212(a)(4) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(4), to apply to both adjustment of status and entry.

  5. Alexiou v. Rogers

    254 F.2d 782 (D.C. Cir. 1958)   Cited 2 times

    No. 13934. Argued March 18, 1958. Decided April 10, 1958. Mr. David Rein, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Joseph Forer, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U.S. Atty., and Lewis Carroll, Asst. U.S. Atty., were on the brief, for appellee. Before WASHINGTON, DANAHER and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges. BASTIAN, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from an order of the District Court sustaining a deportation order. The complaint

  6. Carlisle v. Brownell

    149 F. Supp. 855 (D.D.C. 1957)   Cited 1 times

    No. 4398-53. January 31, 1957. Forer Rein, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff. Oliver Gasch, U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., for defendant. RIZLEY, District Judge. Plaintiff has been ordered deported from the United States as an alien, who, within the provisions of Section 22, Internal Security Act of 1950, was a member of the Communist Party of the United States during certain specified years. The administrative proceedings resulting in the final order of deportation commenced on October 31, 1950, when

  7. Tacettin Say v. Del Guercio

    237 F.2d 715 (9th Cir. 1956)

    No. 14976. October 16, 1956. Harry Wolpin, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant. Laughlin E. Waters, U.S. Atty., Max Deutz, Arline Martin, Asst. U.S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee. Before DENMAN, Chief Judge and LEMMON and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges. DENMAN, Chief Judge. Say, a merchant marine sailor, a citizen of Turkey, under a final order for deportation, but subsequently married to a citizen of the United States, appeals from the District Court's adverse decision in a declaratory judgment proceeding

  8. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,155 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

  9. Section 204.5 - Petitions for employment-based immigrants

    8 C.F.R. § 204.5   Cited 303 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Permitting an alien to retain a priority date associated with an existing employment-based petition