§

In the Matter of Baltazar

16 I&N Dec. 108 (B.I.A. 1977)
In the Matter of Baltazar

14 Cited authorities

  1. Miranda v. Arizona

    384 U.S. 436 (1966)   Cited 61,434 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that officers must inform suspects that they have a right to remain silent, that anything they say may be used as evidence against them, and that they are entitled to the presence of an attorney, either retained or appointed, prior to the interrogation

  2. Escobedo v. Illinois

    378 U.S. 478 (1964)   Cited 4,239 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when a suspect is interrogated with the goal of eliciting incriminating statements and the suspect has not been warned about his or her right to remain silent, the denial of the opportunity to consult with the suspect's attorney is a violation of the Sixth Amendment

  3. Frazier v. Cupp

    394 U.S. 731 (1969)   Cited 1,367 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defendant who left a duffel bag at another's house and allowed joint use of the bag "assumed the risk that [the person] would allow someone else to look inside"

  4. Amalgamated Clothing Work. of Am. v. Prepmore Apparel

    404 U.S. 801 (1971)   Cited 36 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 70-62, 71-5079. September 15, 1971. CASES DISMISSED IN VACATION C.A. 5th Cir. Writ of certiorari dismissed September 15, 1971, pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court. Reported below: 431 F. 2d 1004. [Certiorari granted. 401 U. S. 993.] C.A. 4th Cir. Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed September 29, 1971, pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.

  5. Trias-Hernandez v. I. N. S

    528 F.2d 366 (9th Cir. 1975)   Cited 70 times
    Holding that the substantial distinctions between a deportation proceeding and a criminal trial make Miranda warnings inappropriate in the deportation context

  6. Chavez-Raya v. Immig. Naturalization Serv

    519 F.2d 397 (7th Cir. 1975)   Cited 29 times
    In Chavez-Raya v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 519 F.2d 397 (7th Cir. 1975) the court concluded that a custodial interrogation that did not involve a Miranda warning did not preclude admission of the alien's statement in a deportation proceeding.

  7. Soo Yuen v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service

    456 F.2d 1107 (9th Cir. 1972)   Cited 13 times

    No. 71-2137. March 10, 1972. Earl R. Steen (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner-appellant. Matthew Schumacher, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Sidney I. Lezak, U.S. Atty., George W. Masterton, Richard B. Cagney, Jr., Asst. U.S. Attys., Portland, Or., Joseph Surreck, Reg. Counsel, I.N.S. San Pedro, Cal., Stephen Suffin, Atty., U.S. I.N.S., San Francisco, Cal., Will Wilson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Crim. Div., Washington, D.C., William L. Pattillo, Dist. Dir., Washington, D.C., for respondent-appellee.

  8. Chen v. Foley

    385 F.2d 929 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 17 times
    Recognizing the Board of Immigration Appeals has "consistently held that a preconceived intent to establish permanent residence via the nonimmigrant route . . . is a factor to be considered in denying relief under Section 245" and applying the doctrine where there was "doubt as to the bona fides of the respondent's entry as a nonimmigrant visitor for pleasure"

  9. Nai Cheng Chen v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    537 F.2d 566 (1st Cir. 1976)   Cited 7 times

    No. 76-1065. Argued May 6, 1976. Decided July 13, 1976. Stanley R. Lapon, Cambridge, Mass., with whom Altman Lapon, Cambridge, Mass., was on brief, for petitioners. Richard I. Chaifetz, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., with whom Philip Wilens, Acting Chief, Government Regulations and Labor Section, Crim. Div., and James P. Morris, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent. Petition for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals. Before COFFIN, Chief Judge

  10. Connors v. State of South Dakota

    422 F.2d 122 (8th Cir. 1970)   Cited 7 times

    No. 19785. February 19, 1970. Certiorari Denied June 8, 1970. See 90 S.Ct. 1881. R. James Zieser, Asst. Atty. Gen. of South Dakota, Pierre, S.D., for appellants, Gordon Mydland, Atty. Gen., on the brief. Timothy J. Nimick, of Woods, Fuller, Shultz Smith, Sioux Falls, S.D., for appellee. Before MATTHES, GIBSON and LAY, Circuit Judges. MATTHES, Circuit Judge. Appellants have appealed from the order of the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota granting appellee's petition for

  11. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,159 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable