In the Matter of Baker

23 Cited authorities

Jordan v. De George
341 U.S. 223 (1951) Cited 711 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that defrauding the United States of tax on distilled spirits is a serious crime involving moral turpitude
Fong Haw Tan v. Phelan
333 U.S. 6 (1948) Cited 206 times 2 Legal Analyses
Rejecting government's definition of provision authorizing deportation for multiple criminal convictions
Barber v. Gonzales
347 U.S. 637 (1954) Cited 81 times
Concluding that assault with a deadly weapon is a crime that involves moral turpitude
Wadman v. Immigration and Naturalization Serv
329 F.2d 812 (9th Cir. 1964) Cited 60 times
Adopting a uniform definition of adultery
Guerrero de Nodahl v. Immigration
407 F.2d 1405 (9th Cir. 1969) Cited 28 times
Holding that a statute requiring "cruel and inhuman corporal punishment or injury resulting in a traumatic condition" was a categorical CIMT
Gonzales v. Barber
207 F.2d 398 (9th Cir. 1953) Cited 23 times
In Barber, 207 F.2d at 400, as noted, we had held expressly that California Penal Code section 245, which then encompassed a wide range of aggravated assaults including assault with a firearm, was “per se” a crime involving moral turpitude.
United States v. Corsi
63 F.2d 757 (2d Cir. 1933) Cited 41 times
Holding that "the record of conviction . . . mean the charge (indictment), plea, verdict, and sentence"
Ablett v. Brownell
240 F.2d 625 (D.C. Cir. 1957) Cited 12 times
No. 13243. Argued June 12, 1956. Decided January 10, 1957. Mr. David Carliner, with whom Mr. Jack Wasserman, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant. Mr. John W. Kern, III, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Mr. Oliver Gasch, U.S. Atty., Mr. Lewis Carroll and Mrs. Kitty Blair Frank, Asst. U.S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee. Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U.S. Atty., at the time record was filed, and Milton Eisenberg, Asst. U.S. Atty., also entered appearances for appellee. Before WILBUR K. MILLER
United States ex rel. Guarino v. Uhl
107 F.2d 399 (2d Cir. 1939) Cited 31 times
Holding that an offense must be "necessarily or inherently immoral" to constitute a CIMT under the immigration laws
United States ex Rel. Robinson v. Day
51 F.2d 1022 (2d Cir. 1931) Cited 39 times
In U.S. ex rel. Robinson v. Day, supra, 51 F.2d 1022 we held that an alien was not deportable under § 155 of Title 8 U.S.C.A., even though the judge sentenced him to prison, if he suspended execution.
Section 1251 - Transferred
8 U.S.C. § 1251 Cited 2,154 times 1 Legal Analyses
Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

In the Matter of Baker

23 Cited authorities

Holding that defrauding the United States of tax on distilled spirits is a serious crime involving moral turpitude

Rejecting government's definition of provision authorizing deportation for multiple criminal convictions

Concluding that assault with a deadly weapon is a crime that involves moral turpitude

Adopting a uniform definition of adultery

Holding that a statute requiring "cruel and inhuman corporal punishment or injury resulting in a traumatic condition" was a categorical CIMT

In Barber, 207 F.2d at 400, as noted, we had held expressly that California Penal Code section 245, which then encompassed a wide range of aggravated assaults including assault with a firearm, was “per se” a crime involving moral turpitude.

Holding that "the record of conviction . . . mean the charge (indictment), plea, verdict, and sentence"

Holding that an offense must be "necessarily or inherently immoral" to constitute a CIMT under the immigration laws

In U.S. ex rel. Robinson v. Day, supra, 51 F.2d 1022 we held that an alien was not deportable under § 155 of Title 8 U.S.C.A., even though the judge sentenced him to prison, if he suspended execution.

Delineating crimes that make alien deportable