§
In the Matter of B

11 Cited authorities

  1. Fuller v. Home Indemnity Co.

    318 Mass. 37 (Mass. 1945)   Cited 15 times

    January 3, 1945. March 6, 1945. Present: FIELD, C.J., LUMMUS, QUA, WILKINS, SPALDING, JJ. Bond, Indemnity bond. Contract, Of indemnity, Waiver, Construction. Larceny. Waiver. Error, Whether error harmful. Practice, Civil, Exceptions: whether error harmful. At the trial of an action of contract where an issue was, whether the maker of a check given as payment for securities then delivered to him was guilty of the statutory larceny described in G.L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 266, § 37, as appearing in St. 1937

  2. People v. Smith

    260 N.W. 911 (Mich. 1935)   Cited 24 times
    Holding that effect of Michigan statutory provision abolishing distinction between accessory and principal (currently Mich. Comp. Laws § 767.39) "is to permit the prosecution of one who aid and abets, without regard to the conviction or acquittal of one who, under the common law, would have been called the principal"

  3. People v. Will

    289 N.Y. 413 (N.Y. 1943)   Cited 7 times

    Argued December 4, 1942 Decided January 14, 1943 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, DOWNS, J. Joseph Lonardo for appellant. Charles P. Sullivan, District Attorney ( James F.T. Delaney of counsel), for respondent. LEWIS, J. In connection with his purchase of a quantity of lumber the appellant gave to the seller a check upon a bank where payment thereof was refused because of insufficient funds to the appellant's credit. As a result of the transaction the defendant

  4. Huffman v. State

    185 N.E. 131 (Ind. 1933)   Cited 15 times
    In Huffman v. State, 205 Ind. 75, 84, 185 N.E. 131, 135, the Indiana Supreme Court said: "The condition of a drawer's account at the time a check is issued is not conclusive as to the drawer's knowledge or lack of knowledge that he has not sufficient funds in or credit with the drawee bank to pay the check in full upon presentation."

  5. State v. McGinnis

    116 W. Va. 473 (W. Va. 1935)   Cited 12 times
    In State v. McGinnis, 116 W. Va. 473, 181 S.E. 820 (1935), the indictment was attacked after verdict on the basis it failed to allege the element of intent.

  6. Anderson v. Bryson

    94 Fla. 1165 (Fla. 1927)   Cited 18 times
    In Anderson v. Bryson, 94 Fla. 1165, 115 So. 505, 507, the court said of a postdated check, "The payee knows when he accepts it that the drawer has insufficient funds to pay the check and that its payment depends upon the performance of the drawer's promise to subsequently provide funds for that purpose. Under those circumstances, the payee voluntarily elects to rely, not upon the check, but upon the promise."

  7. Commonwealth v. Bandy

    165 S.W.2d 337 (Ky. Ct. App. 1942)   Cited 2 times

    October 13, 1942. Appeal from Barren Circuit Court. L.B. Handley, Judge. Hubert Meredith, Attorney General, and William F. Neill, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. J.R. White for appellee. OPINION OF THE COURT BY CHIEF JUSTICE PERRY Certifying the Law. George F. Bandy was indicted for violation of Section 1213a, Kentucky Statutes, as amended by Acts of 1930, chapter 179, known as the "Cold Check Law." The trial court sustained a general demurrer to the indictment accusing the appellee, Bandy

  8. People v. Olans

    264 N.Y. 420 (N.Y. 1934)   Cited 6 times

    Argued January 15, 1934 Decided February 27, 1934 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department. Samuel L. Nadler for appellant. William C. Dodge, District Attorney ( John C. McDermott of counsel), for respondent. Judgment reversed and new trial ordered for errors in the exclusion of evidence; no opinion. Concur: POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN, HUBBS and CROUCH, JJ.

  9. People v. Weiss

    263 N.Y. 537 (N.Y. 1933)   Cited 2 times

    Argued October 23, 1933 Decided November 21, 1933 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department. Harry Tabershaw and Theodore N. Tarlau for appellant. Thomas C.T. Crain, District Attorney ( Joshua Egelson of counsel), for respondent. Judgment reversed and information dismissed on the ground that there is no evidence of present intent to defraud when the check was given. No opinion. Concur: POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN, HUBBS and CROUCH, JJ.

  10. Hughes v. Commonwealth

    22 S.W.2d 618 (Ky. Ct. App. 1929)

    Decided December 20, 1929. Appeal from Scott Circuit Court. S. JEWELL RICE for appellant. J.W. CAMMACK, Attorney General (DOUGLAS C. VEST, of counsel), for appellee. OPINION OF THE COURT BY CHIEF JUSTICE THOMAS Reversing. Section 1213a of the 1922 edition of Carroll's Kentucky Statutes is what is commonly known as our "Cold Check" statute. In substance it provides that any person who issues a check on a bank, payable to another, with intent to defraud such other, and who knows at the time of doing