§
In the Matter of B

5 Cited authorities

  1. Masaichi Ono v. Carr

    56 F.2d 772 (9th Cir. 1932)   Cited 9 times

    No. 6630. March 7, 1932. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Central Division of the Southern District of California; William P. James, Judge. Habeas corpus proceeding by Masaichi Ono against Walter E. Carr, District Director, United States Immigration Service, District No. 31. From an order discharging the writ and remanding petitioner to the custody of the United States Immigration Service for return to Japan, petitioner appeals. Affirmed. J. Edward Keating and Theodore

  2. Ex Parte Keizo Shibata

    30 F.2d 942 (S.D. Cal. 1929)   Cited 4 times

    No. 9440-H. February 27, 1929. J. Edward Keating and Theodore E. Bowen, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. S.W. McNabb, U.S. Atty., and W.R. Gallagher, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Habeas Corpus. Proceeding by Keizo Shibata to secure his release from custody of the immigration officers under warrant of deportation. Writ discharged, and petitioner remanded. JAMES, District Judge. Petitioner is held by the immigration officers under authority of a warrant of

  3. Ex Parte Chin Chan on

    32 F.2d 828 (W.D. Wash. 1929)   Cited 3 times

    No. 20068. May 15, 1929. Hugh C. Todd, of Seattle, Wash., for applicants. Anthony Savage, U.S. Atty., and Tom DeWolfe, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of Seattle, Wash., for the United States. Habeas Corpus by Chin Chan On and another to procure their release from custody under exclusion orders. Writ denied. Chin Chan On, a Chinaman, seeks admission to the United States as a returning merchant, and brings with him Chin Cheung, his three-year old son, and also Lee Shee, an alleged wife. Chin Chan On was denied

  4. Section 231 - Civil disorders

    18 U.S.C. § 231   Cited 260 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Teaching or demonstrating to another the use, application, or making of any firearm or explosive or incendiary device "knowing or having reason to know or intending" that it will be unlawfully employed for use in, or in furtherance of, a civil disorder that may obstruct, delay, or adversely affect commerce

  5. Section 220 - Repealed

    8 U.S.C. § 220   Cited 11 times   1 Legal Analyses

    8 U.S.C. § 220 June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §21, 62 Stat. 862, eff. Sept. 1, 1948 Section, act May 26, 1924, ch. 190, §22, 43 Stat. 165, related to forging, counterfeiting, etc., of reentry permits. See section 1546 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.