§
In the Matter of B

16 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,675 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Accardi v. Shaughnessy

    347 U.S. 260 (1954)   Cited 891 times
    Holding that Board of Immigration Appeals was required to follow its own regulations in deciding whether to suspend deportation

  3. United States v. Menasche

    348 U.S. 528 (1955)   Cited 749 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting an interpretation of a statutory provision that would nullify the effect of another provision

  4. Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath

    339 U.S. 33 (1950)   Cited 446 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Administrative Procedure Act required deportation hearings even though current INS regulations did not

  5. Bridges v. Wixon

    326 U.S. 135 (1945)   Cited 466 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding only that a court may not admit hearsay for substantive, as opposed to impeachment, purposes

  6. Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding

    344 U.S. 590 (1953)   Cited 282 times
    Holding that an alien who permanently resided in the United States was "a person within the protection of the Fifth Amendment" and therefore was entitled to due process

  7. Lilly v. Grand Trunk R. Co.

    317 U.S. 481 (1943)   Cited 247 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding use of a tender, which was covered with ice, and upon whose top an employee had to go in course of duties, was submissible jury issue under claim that the LIA had been violated, when regulatory rule required "Top of tender behind fuel space shall be kept clean and means provided to carry off waste water."

  8. Delgadillo v. Carmichael

    332 U.S. 388 (1947)   Cited 154 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a nonresident does not make an "entry" into the United States when he had no intent to "depart," or left involuntarily

  9. Mahler v. Eby

    264 U.S. 32 (1924)   Cited 232 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the government failed to comply "with all the statutory requirements"

  10. F.C.C. v. Allentown Broadcasting Co.

    349 U.S. 358 (1955)   Cited 90 times
    Upholding FCC reversal of hearing examiner

  11. Section 1.1 - Applicability

    8 C.F.R. § 1.1   Cited 158 times
    Providing that LPR status terminates upon the entry of a final order of removal