§
IN THE MATTER OF AU

4 Cited authorities

  1. Carlson v. Landon

    342 U.S. 524 (1952)   Cited 626 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that mandatory detention of Communist noncitizens in removal proceedings does not violate the Due Process Clause

  2. Rubinstein v. Brownell

    206 F.2d 449 (D.C. Cir. 1953)   Cited 37 times
    In Rubinstein v. Brownell, 92 U.S.App. D.C. 328, 331, 206 F.2d 449, 452, a deportation case, we had no occasion to point out that § 360(c) does not apply to all exclusion cases.

  3. United States v. Esperdy

    279 F. Supp. 880 (S.D.N.Y. 1967)   Cited 2 times

    No. 67 Civ. 3008. August 15, 1967. Robert L. Feldt, The Legal Aid Society, New York City, for relator. Francis J. Lyons, Special Asst. U.S. Atty., Southern District of New York, New York City, for the United States. MOTLEY, District Judge. OPINION The relator, Tomislav Kordic, previously challenged, in a petition for a writ of habeas corpus before this court, the denial of his right to a hearing on his claim that if he is returned to Yugoslavia he will suffer political persecution. 8 U.S.C. § 1253(h)

  4. Fuentes-Torres v. Immigration Nat. Service

    344 F.2d 911 (9th Cir. 1965)

    No. 19456. April 8, 1965. Milton T. Simmons, Donald L. Ungar, Phelan, Simmons Ungar, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Cecil F. Poole, U.S. Atty., Charles Elmer Collett, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before HAMLEY, MERRILL and BROWNING, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. Proceeding under section 106(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (Act), 75 Stat. 651 (1961), 8 U.S.C. § 1105a (1958, Supp. III), Doroteo Fuentes-Torres petitioned this court to review an order for his deportation