IN THE MATTER OF ANWO

8 Cited authorities

  1. Francis v. Immigration Naturalization Serv

    532 F.2d 268 (2d Cir. 1976)   Cited 249 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "fundamental fairness" dictates that § 212(c) apply to resident aliens in deportation as well as exclusion proceedings
  2. Gilbert v. David

    235 U.S. 561 (1915)   Cited 407 times
    Holding that domicile determines citizenship
  3. Stifel v. Hopkins

    477 F.2d 1116 (6th Cir. 1973)   Cited 211 times
    Holding that a prisoner may show he has developed the intention to be domiciled in the state in which he is incarcerated, when his citizenship prior to incarceration was elsewhere
  4. Lok v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    548 F.2d 37 (2d Cir. 1977)   Cited 65 times
    Holding that domicile for purposes of § 212(c) relief can only be established while under lawful status
  5. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Whisnant

    387 F.2d 774 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 48 times
    Holding that the canons of construction mandate that courts give effect, when ever possible, to all parts of a statute and avoid interpretation that makes a part redundant or superfluous
  6. Maiatico v. United States

    302 F.2d 880 (D.C. Cir. 1962)   Cited 33 times
    Holding the General Services Administration condemned property outside the statutorily-designated "taking area" and, therefore, acted without authority
  7. Johansen v. Confederation Life Association

    447 F.2d 175 (2d Cir. 1971)   Cited 6 times
    Holding that for the purposes of a New York conflicts determination, courts should "look to the domicile of the insureds themselves at the time they entered into the contracts, rather than to the domicile of the plaintiffs at the time of bringing suit."
  8. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,159 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable