§
IN THE MATTER OF ANDA

8 Cited authorities

  1. Chula v. Superior Court

    57 Cal.2d 199 (Cal. 1962)   Cited 55 times
    Holding the "failure of an attorney, without valid excuse, to be present in court" constitutes "a direct contempt which the court is empowered to punish summarily"

  2. In re Niblack

    476 F.2d 930 (D.C. Cir. 1973)   Cited 28 times

    No. 72-1086. March 8, 1973. Rehearing Denied June 5, 1973. Arthur J. Whalen, Jr., Washington, D.C., with whom Joan M. McIntyre, Washington, D.C., was on the brief for appellant. Harold H. Titus, Jr., U.S. Atty., John A. Terry, Brian W. Shaughnessy and Gregory C. Brady, Asst. U.S. Attys., were on the brief for appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, and ROBINSON and ROBB, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This is an appeal from a

  3. Lyons v. Superior Court

    43 Cal.2d 755 (Cal. 1955)   Cited 53 times
    In Lyons v. Superior Court (1955) 43 Cal.2d 755 [ 278 P.2d 681] the majority held that an attorney's failure to appear was "`a contempt... committed in the immediate view and presence of the court' — i.e., a direct contempt — which the court is empowered to punish summarily under the provisions of section 1211 of the Code of Civil Procedure."

  4. In re Farquhar

    492 F.2d 561 (D.C. Cir. 1973)   Cited 25 times
    Contrasting aberrational with recurrent lapses when analyzing intent

  5. Hess Clark, Div. of Rhodia, v. Food Drug

    495 F.2d 975 (D.C. Cir. 1974)   Cited 24 times
    Approving the FDA's use of the summary judgment procedure where the NOOH presents a “prima facie case for withdrawal”

  6. L M Industries, Inc. v. Kenter

    458 F.2d 968 (2d Cir. 1972)   Cited 3 times

    No. 112, Docket 71-1551. Argued October 6, 1971. Decided April 10, 1972. Milton A. Bass, Sheldon S. Lustigan, David L. Ficksman, Bass Ullman, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant. Carl I. Stewart, David G. Trager, Edward R. Korman, Asst. U.S. Attys., Robert A. Morse, U.S. Atty., for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Before FRIENDLY, Chief Judge, and WATERMAN and SMITH, Circuit Judges. WATERMAN, Circuit Judge: The plaintiff, L

  7. Section 401 - Power of court

    18 U.S.C. § 401   Cited 2,250 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Finding of contempt discretionary in Court

  8. Section 292.3 - Professional conduct for practitioners-Rules and procedures

    8 C.F.R. § 292.3   Cited 16 times
    Providing for sanctions against "a practitioner who is authorized to practice before DHS"