In the Matter of Amiet

9 Cited authorities

  1. Ruiz v. United States

    365 F.2d 103 (10th Cir. 1966)   Cited 11 times
    Implying guilt or commenting on the evidence
  2. Varga v. Rosenberg

    237 F. Supp. 282 (S.D. Cal. 1964)   Cited 11 times

    Civ. No. 64-796. September 23, 1964. David C. Marcus, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Manuel L. Real, U.S. Atty., Donald A. Fareed, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chief Civil Section, James R. Dooley, Asst. U.S. Atty., by James R. Dooley, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. STEPHENS, District Judge. Petitioner made application for a writ of habeas corpus and the Court issued an order directing the respondent to show cause why the petition should not be granted. The matter came on regularly for hearing on the

  3. United States v. Chapman

    321 F. Supp. 767 (E.D. Va. 1971)   Cited 4 times

    Crim. No. 174-70-A. January 18, 1971. Justin Williams, Asst. U.S. Atty., Alexandria, Va., for plaintiff. Paul G. Varoutsos, North Arlington, Va., James M. Shellow, Milwaukee, Wis., for defendant. MEMORANDUM WALTER E. HOFFMAN, Chief Judge. On June 9, 1970, the defendant was arrested by U.S. Park Police at the Washington National Airport and was charged and prosecuted in federal court for illegal posseession of marihuana in violation of the Code of Virginia, sections 54-488 and 54-516, under the Assimilative

  4. United States v. Oropeza

    275 F.2d 558 (7th Cir. 1960)   Cited 6 times

    No. 12770. March 7, 1960. Doris A. Coonrod, Chicago, Ill., for appellant. Robert Tieken, U.S. Atty., J.B. McFaddin, John Peter Lulinski, Asst. U.S. Attys., of counsel, Chicago, Ill., for appellee. Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge, DUFFY, Circuit Judge, and STECKLER, District Judge. HASTINGS, Chief Judge. Defendant-appellant Benito Cruz Oropeza and two co-defendants, Griego and Vasquez, were convicted in a court trial, without a jury, on a one-count indictment charging unlawful possession of marihuana

  5. Hoy v. Mendoza-Rivera

    267 F.2d 451 (9th Cir. 1959)   Cited 5 times

    No. 16107. April 3, 1959. Laughlin E. Waters, U.S. Atty., Henry P. Johnson, Richard A. Lavine, Asst. U.S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant. Harlin M. Fuller, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee. Before FEE, BARNES and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges. JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge. Mendoza-Rivera brought a declaratory judgment proceeding seeking in the ultimate a pronouncement that he is not deportable by appellant as an officer of the Immigration and Naturalization Service. He is not in custody. The

  6. Mendoza-Rivera v. Del Guercio

    161 F. Supp. 473 (S.D. Cal. 1958)   Cited 3 times

    No. 813-57. February 24, 1958. Harlin M. Fuller, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff. Laughlin E. Waters, U.S. Atty., Richard A. Lavine and Norman R. Atkins, Asst. U.S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant. WESTOVER, District Judge. Plaintiff, Manuel Mendoza-Rivera, is a citizen of Mexico who has been in the United States since the age of two years. On January 10, 1952, in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of Los Angeles, he was convicted of possession of flowering

  7. Section 801 - Congressional findings and declarations: controlled substances

    21 U.S.C. § 801   Cited 7,301 times   77 Legal Analyses
    Finding that to effectively control interstate traffic in illegal drugs it is necessary to control intrastate possession of and traffic in those substances
  8. Section 844 - Penalties for simple possession

    21 U.S.C. § 844   Cited 2,905 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Providing for "a term of imprisonment of not more than 1 year" for possession offenses except for repeat offenders, persons who possess more than five grams of cocaine base, and persons who possess flunitrazepam
  9. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,155 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable