§

In the Matter of Alarcon

20 I&N Dec. 557 (B.I.A. 1992)
In the Matter of Alarcon

15 Cited authorities

  1. Woodby v. Immigration Service

    385 U.S. 276 (1966)   Cited 747 times
    Holding that "no deportation order may be entered unless it is found by clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence that the facts alleged as grounds for deportation are true"

  2. Jordan v. De George

    341 U.S. 223 (1951)   Cited 711 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defrauding the United States of tax on distilled spirits is a serious crime involving moral turpitude

  3. Ziffrin, Inc. v. United States

    318 U.S. 73 (1943)   Cited 110 times
    Upholding the Interstate Commerce Commission's denial of an appellant's application for a permit to continue designated contract carrier operations under the grandfather clause of a particular statute, because Congress amended the relevant laws between the appellant's filing of the application and the Interstate Commerce Commission's final order, adding an additional requirement that the appellant could not fulfill

  4. Lok v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    681 F.2d 107 (2d Cir. 1982)   Cited 56 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the Supreme Court ruled that an alien did not have to be a permanent resident to harbor a lawful intent to remain. Thousands of aliens could become lawful domiciliaries without becoming permanent residents under Elkins."

  5. Pei-Chi Tien v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    638 F.2d 1324 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 12 times

    No. 80-1955. Summary Calendar. March 12, 1981. Wasserman, Orlow, Ginsberg Rubin, Mark A. Mancini, Thomas A. Elliot, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Benjamin R. Civiletti, Atty. Gen., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Philip Wilens, Chief Govt. Reg. Labor Sec., Eric Fisher, James P. Morris, Stephen M. Weglian, Attys., Crim. Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Edwin Chauvin, Jr., Dist. Director, INS, New Orleans, La., Paul B. O'Neill, Houston, Tex., for other interested parties. Petition

  6. Yui Sing Tse v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    596 F.2d 831 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 13 times

    No. 77-1075. March 26, 1979. Robert O. Wells, Jr. (argued), Moriarty, Long, Mikkelborg Broz, Seattle, Wash., for petitioners-appellants. Lauren S. Kahn (argued), Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Philip Wilens, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent-appellee. On Petition for Review of Deportation Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Before BROWNING and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and WATERS, District Judge. Honorable Laughlin E. Waters, United States District Judge for the Central

  7. Talanoa v. Immigration Naturalization Serv

    397 F.2d 196 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 15 times
    In Talanoa v. INS, 397 F.2d 196 (9th Cir. 1968), the court explained: "Petitioner had been eligible for the relief sought when he first applied for it. He became ineligible by virtue of the change in the law, to-wit, he became unable to obtain a labor certification pursuant to [the changed law]. It is settled that when the law is changed before a decision is handed down by an administrative agency, the agency must apply the new law."

  8. Patsis v. Immigration Naturalization Service

    337 F.2d 733 (8th Cir. 1964)   Cited 8 times

    No. 17316. October 29, 1964. Albert J. Yonke, Kansas City, Mo., made argument for petitioner and filed brief. Don Bennett, Atty., Immigration Naturalization Dept., Washington, D.C., made argument for respondent and filed brief with Kenneth C. Shelver, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C. and Richard D. FitzGibbon, U.S. Atty., and Grove G. Sweet, Asst. U.S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo. Before VOGEL, MATTHES and BLACKMUN, Circuit Judges. BLACKMUN, Circuit Judge. Athanasios Patsis petitions for review

  9. Fassilis v. Esperdy

    301 F.2d 429 (2d Cir. 1962)   Cited 8 times
    In Fassilis, the court held that a statutory change making alien crewman — as opposed to other aliens — ineligible for adjustment of status applied to alien crewmen whose applications were pending on the date of enactment.

  10. Klapholz v. Esperdy

    201 F. Supp. 294 (S.D.N.Y. 1961)   Cited 7 times
    In Klapholz v. Esperdy, 201 F. Supp. 294 (S.D.N.Y. 1961), the alien applied for admission on shipboard on July 30, 1956, and was served with Form I-122 on August 2, 1956.

  11. Section 1341 - Frauds and swindles

    18 U.S.C. § 1341   Cited 13,418 times   104 Legal Analyses
    Relating to mail fraud

  12. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,718 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  13. Section 1255 - Adjustment of status of nonimmigrant to that of person admitted for permanent residence

    8 U.S.C. § 1255   Cited 2,836 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Listing classes of nonimmigrants, such as students and tourists

  14. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,154 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable