§

In the Matter of Adetiba

20 I&N Dec. 506 (B.I.A. 1992)
In the Matter of Adetiba

19 Cited authorities

  1. Woodby v. Immigration Service

    385 U.S. 276 (1966)   Cited 746 times
    Holding that "no deportation order may be entered unless it is found by clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence that the facts alleged as grounds for deportation are true"

  2. Jordan v. De George

    341 U.S. 223 (1951)   Cited 711 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defrauding the United States of tax on distilled spirits is a serious crime involving moral turpitude

  3. Lok v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    681 F.2d 107 (2d Cir. 1982)   Cited 56 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the Supreme Court ruled that an alien did not have to be a permanent resident to harbor a lawful intent to remain. Thousands of aliens could become lawful domiciliaries without becoming permanent residents under Elkins."

  4. Okabe v. Immigration and Naturalization Serv

    671 F.2d 863 (5th Cir. 1982)   Cited 35 times
    Holding that offering a bribe is a CIMT because "a corrupt mind is an essential element of the offense"

  5. Leon-Hernandez v. U.S. I.N.S.

    926 F.2d 902 (9th Cir. 1991)   Cited 17 times
    Holding that two acts of oral copulation with a person under the age of sixteen committed one month apart were not part of a common scheme "[i]n the absence of evidence of a more conscious, coherent 'plan or program of future action'"

  6. Gonzalez-Sandoval v. U.S.I.N.S.

    910 F.2d 614 (9th Cir. 1990)   Cited 14 times
    In Gonzalez-Sandoval, we reversed a BIA decision that relied on the First Circuit’s standard rather than the Wood standard in interpreting "single scheme."

  7. Pacheco v. Immigration Naturalization Serv

    546 F.2d 448 (1st Cir. 1976)   Cited 19 times
    Holding that two breaking and entering incidents that were separated by two days of time were not pursuant to a single scheme even though both may have occurred during a continuous drinking binge. The court equated "single scheme" with a "temporally integrated episode of continuous activity."

  8. Sawkow v. Immigration and Naturalization Serv

    314 F.2d 34 (3d Cir. 1963)   Cited 24 times
    Holding that INS failed to prove that crimes of receiving stolen vehicle and stealing a different vehicle one day later were not part of a single scheme

  9. Wood v. Hoy

    266 F.2d 825 (9th Cir. 1959)   Cited 27 times
    In Wood, we rejected the BIA’s interpretation as "not what the statute says" because the BIA "applied the statute as if it read ‘single criminal act’ " rather than "single scheme of criminal misconduct."

  10. Chanan Din Khan v. Barber

    253 F.2d 547 (9th Cir. 1958)   Cited 24 times
    In Chanan Din Kahn v Barber (253 F.2d 547), the court held that fraudulent filing of tax returns for two successive years were not crimes arising out of a single scheme of criminal misconduct.

  11. Section 1341 - Frauds and swindles

    18 U.S.C. § 1341   Cited 13,396 times   103 Legal Analyses
    Relating to mail fraud

  12. Section 1029 - Fraud and related activity in connection with access devices

    18 U.S.C. § 1029   Cited 2,300 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Criminalizing conspiracy to commit access device fraud

  13. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,154 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

  14. Section 408 - Penalties

    42 U.S.C. § 408   Cited 1,148 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Penalizing false statement to obtain social security benefits

  15. Section 1342 - Fictitious name or address

    18 U.S.C. § 1342   Cited 580 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Assuming a fictitious name or address to promote a scheme