§
In the Matter of A.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Accardi v. Shaughnessy

    347 U.S. 260 (1954)   Cited 883 times
    Holding that Board of Immigration Appeals was required to follow its own regulations in deciding whether to suspend deportation

  2. Carlson v. Landon

    342 U.S. 524 (1952)   Cited 630 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that mandatory detention of Communist noncitizens in removal proceedings does not violate the Due Process Clause

  3. Harisiades v. Shaughnessy

    342 U.S. 580 (1952)   Cited 563 times
    Holding that the Ex Post Facto Clause does not apply to deportation orders because "[d]eportation, however severe its consequences, has been consistently classified as a civil rather than a criminal procedure"

  4. Philippides v. Day

    283 U.S. 48 (1931)   Cited 31 times
    In Philippides v. Day, 283 U.S. 48, 51 S.Ct. 358, 359, 75 L.Ed. 833, Justice Holmes said: "Any alien' in section 14 of the act of 1924 includes alien seamen on its face and by the definition in section 28, Id. (8 U.S.C.A. § 224).

  5. United States v. Trudell

    284 U.S. 279 (1932)   Cited 28 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 162. Argued December 9, 1931. Decided January 4, 1932. 1. Under the Immigration Act of May 26, 1924, § 13(a), (b), and the executive regulations pursuant thereto, an alien who was lawfully domiciled in this country but who went abroad for a temporary visit, cannot reenter unless he has either an immigration visa or a return permit. P. 280. 2. In habeas corpus to determine the right of an alien to enter the country, the burden

  6. Ex Parte Robles-Rubio

    119 F. Supp. 610 (N.D. Cal. 1954)   Cited 8 times

    No. 33229. January 21, 1954. Lloyd H. Burke, U.S. Atty., Charles Elmer Collett, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Sol A. Abrams, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. GOODMAN, District Judge. Petitioner, Robles-Rubio, an alien Mexican national, being detained and about to be deported by the District Director of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, petitions for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that he is detained and illegally threatened with deportation

  7. United States v. Neelly

    115 F. Supp. 615 (N.D. Ill. 1953)   Cited 6 times

    No. 53 C 1902. October 21, 1953. Thomas M. Tracey, of Chicago, Ill., for relator. Otto Kerner, Jr., U.S. Atty. for Northern District of Ill., Chicago, Ill., and John P. Lulinski and Anthony Scariano, Asst. U.S. Attys., Chicago, Ill., for respondent. CAMPBELL, District Judge. A petition for a writ of habeas corpus was filed on behalf of one Nickolas Deani Circella on September 14, 1953. The writ was issued on that date by the Honorable John P. Barnes, Judge of this Court. The petition alleges that

  8. United States v. Murff

    116 F. Supp. 163 (D. Md. 1953)   Cited 3 times

    Civ. A. No. 6954. November 10, 1953. H. Raymond Cluster, Baltimore, Md., for relator. George Cochran Doub, U.S. Atty., Walter E. Black, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Baltimore, Md., Abraham Scharf, Department of Immigration and Naturalization, Baltimore, Md., for respondent. CHESNUT, District Judge. The petitioner, an alien, is seeking a writ of habeas corpus to release him from the custody of the Commissioner of Immigration under a warrant for deportation. A rule to show cause was issued on the filing

  9. United States v. Anastasio

    120 F. Supp. 435 (D.N.J. 1954)   Cited 2 times

    Civ. No. 1189-52. April 14, 1954. William F. Tompkins, U.S. Atty., Newark, N.J., Edward V. Ryan, Asst. U.S. Atty., Jersey City, N.J., Louis Steinberg, N.Y. Dist., Immigration Naturalization Serv., New York City, for plaintiff. Samuel Paige, New York City, for defendant. SMITH, District Judge. This is an action to cancel and set aside a certificate of naturalization on the grounds that the same was fraudulently and illegally procured. The jurisdiction of the Court is derived from Section 338(a) of

  10. United States v. Watkins

    88 F. Supp. 51 (S.D.N.Y. 1949)   Cited 2 times

    July 11, 1949. Hyman Margolies, Brooklyn, N.Y., for relator. John F.X. McGohey, U.S. Atty. for Southern Dist. of N.Y., New York City, William J. Sexton, Asst. U.S. Atty. and Alvin Lieberman, Attorney, U.S. Dept. of Justice Immigration and Naturalization Service, New York City, of counsel, for respondent. SAMUEL H. KAUFMAN, District Judge. Relator is a native of territory which is now incorporated in the State of Czechoslovakia. He was last a citizen of Hungary, but claims to have observed his name

  11. Section 223 to 229 - Repealed

    22 U.S.C. § 223 - 22 U.S.C. § 229   Cited 56 times

    22 U.S.C. § 223 to 229 June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title IV, §403(a)(15), (20), (43), 66 Stat. 279, 280 Section 223, acts May 22, 1918, ch. 81, §1, 40 Stat. 559; June 21, 1941, ch. 210, §1, 55 Stat. 252, related to wartime restrictions generally. See section 1185 of Title 8, Aliens and Nationality. Section 224, act May 22, 1918, ch. 81, §2, 40 Stat. 559, related to requirement of passport for citizens during wartime restrictions. See section 1185 of Title 8. Section 225, acts May 22, 1918, ch. 81, §3