September 30, 1942. Samuel M. Fleischman for appellants. Leo J. Hagerty, District Attorney ( Maurice Frey of counsel), for respondent. WARD, J. These defendants were convicted of violating section 722, subdivision 2, of the Penal Law (L. 1923, ch. 642) by the Hon. Burke I. Burke, Police Justice of the Village of East Aurora. The defendants are students at the East Aurora High School in said village. The information, made upon information and belief, alleges that the specific offense was: "Gathering

December 3, 1937. Protter Bagley [ Julius Bagley of counsel], for the defendant Deegan. Abraham J. Isserman, of the New Jersey bar, for the defendant Kaufman. Hallam M. Richardson, for the complainant. PINTO, C.M. By a previous ruling the investigation of the complaint pursuant to the summons has been limited to one charge, viz., that defendants conspired to commit a crime in violation of subdivision 1 of section 580 of the Penal Law. The facts constituting the alleged crime are set forth in complainant's

December 1, 1934. George V. Dorsey, District Attorney [ Henry V. Stebbins of counsel], for the complainant. Leo Fassberg, for the defendant. SHERWOOD, J. The defendant was arrested and convicted in the village police justice court for an alleged violation of Penal Law, section 722. Section 722, as enacted in 1923, was limited to cities of 1,000,000, and by amendment in 1924 to cities of 500,000, and by amendment of 1931 the limitation as to cities of a given population was removed. But section 724