§
In the Matter of A.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Application of Martini

    184 F. Supp. 395 (S.D.N.Y. 1960)   Cited 9 times
    Holding that naturalization and removal are entirely different matters, and that “[p]resence in the United States, lawful or unlawful, does not affect the right to naturalization”

  2. Lee Hong v. Acheson

    110 F. Supp. 60 (N.D. Cal. 1953)   Cited 14 times

    No. 30651. January 22, 1953. Jackson Hertogs, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff. Chauncey Tramutolo, U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., Charles Elmer Collett, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for defendants. OLIVER J. CARTER, District Judge. Plaintiff has brought an action under the provisions of 8 U.S.C.A. § 903, seeking a judicial declaration that he is a citizen or a national of the United States. The original complaint named the Secretary of State as defendant upon the theory that such officer

  3. Lee Bang Hong v. Acheson

    110 F. Supp. 48 (D. Haw. 1951)   Cited 13 times

    Civ. 1052. November 29, 1951. Sau Ung Loo Chan, Honolulu, Hawaii, for plaintiff. H.K. Hoddick, Acting U.S. Atty., and W.C. Ingman, Asst. U.S. Atty., Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendant. METZGER, District Judge. Findings of Fact 1. The Plaintiff was born in San Chin Village, Chungshan, Kwangtung, China on July 13, 1934. He is the blood son of Lee Chin Fat, a United States citizen, who was born in Honolulu, Territory of Hawaii. Lee Bang Hong is a United States citizen by birth by virtue of the fact that

  4. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,155 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable