In the Matter of A.

3 Cited authorities

  1. Harisiades v. Shaughnessy

    342 U.S. 580 (1952)   Cited 582 times
    Holding that the Ex Post Facto Clause does not apply to deportation orders because "[d]eportation, however severe its consequences, has been consistently classified as a civil rather than a criminal procedure"
  2. Galvan v. Press

    347 U.S. 522 (1954)   Cited 389 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while aliens may receive procedural due process, the court's ability to review the substantive policy of immigration statutes is limited to review for rationality
  3. Latva v. Nicolls

    106 F. Supp. 658 (D. Mass. 1952)   Cited 2 times

    Misc. Civ. No. 52-49. August 6, 1952. Frederick Cohen, of Boston, Mass., for petitioner. Philip T. Jones, of Boston, Asst. U.S. Atty., and Albert E. Reitzel, of Washington, D.C., Asst. Gen. Counsel of United States Department of Justice Immigration and Naturalization Service, for respondent. WYZANSKI, District Judge. Petitioner, having been ordered deported under § 22 of the McCarran Act, (the Internal Security Act of 1950, 64 Stat. 987, 1006 amending § 1(2)(c) and § 4(a) of the Act of October 16