In the Matter of A.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Jordan v. De George

    341 U.S. 223 (1951)   Cited 711 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defrauding the United States of tax on distilled spirits is a serious crime involving moral turpitude
  2. Cross v. North Carolina

    132 U.S. 131 (1889)   Cited 49 times

    ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 1084. Argued October 22, 1889. Decided November 11, 1889. A State is not deprived of jurisdiction over a person who criminally forges a bill of exchange or promissory note with intent to defraud, in violation of its statutes, or of its power to punish the offender committing such offence, by the fact that he follows this crime up by committing against the United States the further crime of making false entries concerning such bill or

  3. United States ex Rel. Robinson v. Day

    51 F.2d 1022 (2d Cir. 1931)   Cited 39 times
    In U.S. ex rel. Robinson v. Day, supra, 51 F.2d 1022 we held that an alien was not deportable under § 155 of Title 8 U.S.C.A., even though the judge sentenced him to prison, if he suspended execution.
  4. United States v. Zimmerman

    71 F. Supp. 534 (E.D. Pa. 1947)   Cited 14 times
    In UnitedStates v. Zimmerman (E.D.Pa. 1947) 71 F. Supp. 534, the court stated with regard to a similar offense under a similar law: "I cannot say that the action of an escaping prisoner involves that element of baseness, vileness or depravity which has been regarded as necessarily inherent in the concept of moral turpitude.
  5. United States v. Miller

    87 F. Supp. 285 (S.D.N.Y. 1949)   Cited 4 times

    Civ. 53-187. December 1, 1949. Rosenblatt Spielberg, New York City, for petitioner. Irving H. Saypol, United States Attorney, New York City (William J. Sexton, Assistant United States Attorney, Lester Friedman, Attorney, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Department of Justice, New York City, of counsel), for respondent Miller. IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge. The relator herein seeks an order sustaining a writ of habeas corpus. The relator, Hirsch Teper, a native and citizen of Great Britain

  6. United States v. Karnuth

    31 F. Supp. 799 (W.D.N.Y. 1940)   Cited 8 times

    No. 347. February 1, 1940. William H. Jones and Donald Bain, both of Buffalo, N.Y., for petitioner. George L. Grobe, U.S. Atty., of Buffalo, N.Y. (Joseph J. Doran, Asst. U.S. Atty., of Rochester, N.Y., of counsel), for respondent. Proceeding by the United States of America, on the relation of Adonai J.L. Chartrand, for a writ of habeas corpus directed to Arthur J. Karnuth, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Buffalo, N Y Writ dismissed. KNIGHT, District Judge. This proceeding

  7. Ponzi v. Ward

    7 F. Supp. 736 (D. Mass. 1934)   Cited 9 times

    No. 5201. July 30, 1934. Peter Maggio, of Everett, Mass., for plaintiff. Francis J.W. Ford, U.S. Atty., and Arthur J.B. Cartier, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of Boston, Mass., for defendant. BREWSTER, District Judge. This is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus heard upon the merits before writ issued. By agreement of parties, it was submitted upon the record in the Immigration Bureau. The petitioner is held upon a deportation warrant issued September 28, 1927. The reason for the delay in executing the

  8. Section 494 - Contractors' bonds, bids, and public records

    18 U.S.C. § 494   Cited 28 times
    Criminalizing the act of falsely making statements in order to defraud the United States
  9. Section 259 to 261a - Repealed

    42 U.S.C. § 259 - 42 U.S.C. § 261a   Cited 10 times

    42 U.S.C. § 259 to 261a Pub. L. 106-310, div. B, title XXXIV, §3405(a), Oct. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 1221, as amended by Pub. L. 114-198, title I, §110(b), July 22, 2016, 130 Stat. 710 Section 259, acts July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title III, §343, 58 Stat. 699; Pub. L. 91-513, title I, §2(a)(2)(A), (3), (4), Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1240; Pub. L. 92-293, §3, May 11, 1972, 86 Stat. 136; Pub. L. 98-473, title II, §232(b), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2031, related to convict addicts or other persons with drug abuse

  10. Section 257 - Repealed

    42 U.S.C. § 257   Cited 6 times

    42 U.S.C. § 257 Pub. L. 106-310, div. B, title XXXIV, §3405(a), Oct. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 1221, as amended by Pub. L. 114-198, title I, §110(b), July 22, 2016, 130 Stat. 710 Section, acts July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title III, §341, 58 Stat. 698; May 8, 1954, ch. 195, §3, 68 Stat. 80; July 24, 1956, ch. 676, title III, §302(a), 70 Stat. 622; Pub. L. 89-793, title VI, §601, Nov. 8, 1966, 80 Stat. 1449; 1967 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §401, eff. Nov. 3, 1967 (in part), 32 F.R. 11669, 81 Stat. 951; Pub. L. 91-513