§
In re Y-S-L-C

9 Cited authorities

  1. Colmenar v. Immigration Naturalization Serv

    210 F.3d 967 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 837 times
    Holding that a full and fair hearing includes "a reasonable opportunity to present evidence"

  2. Sukwanputra v. Gonzales

    434 F.3d 627 (3d Cir. 2006)   Cited 308 times
    Holding that whether petitioner had “met her burden of demonstrating changed circumstances materially affecting asylum eligibility or extraordinary circumstances relating to the delay challenges [the Attorney General's] exercise of discretion” and therefore “[s]uch a claim does not raise a constitutional claim or question of law covered by the REAL ID Act's judicial review provision”

  3. Ali v. Mukasey

    529 F.3d 478 (2d Cir. 2008)   Cited 220 times
    Holding that the law of the case should not be overturned "absent 'cogent' and 'compelling' reasons such as 'an intervening change of controlling law, the availability of new evidence, or the need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice'" (quoting United States v. Tenzer, 213 F.3d 34, 39 (2d Cir. 2000))

  4. U.S. v. Champion

    813 F.2d 1154 (11th Cir. 1987)   Cited 131 times
    Holding that "[n]ewly discovered impeaching evidence is insufficient to warrant a new trial"

  5. Wang v. Attorney General of U.S.

    423 F.3d 260 (3d Cir. 2005)   Cited 55 times
    Finding inappropriate the "bullying" nature of the immigration judge's questioning

  6. Cham v. Attorney General of the United States

    445 F.3d 683 (3d Cir. 2006)   Cited 53 times
    Holding that Petitioner's due process rights were violated where the IJ approached the petitioner with "belligerence" and "wholesale nitpicking of [his] testimony"

  7. Felzcerek v. I.N.S.

    75 F.3d 112 (2d Cir. 1996)   Cited 70 times
    Holding that the presumption of reliability afforded to a Form I-213 is lost when a petitioner introduces evidence contradicting statements in the form or undermining its reliability

  8. Rule 701 - Opinion Testimony by Lay Witnesses

    Fed. R. Evid. 701   Cited 5,761 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Requiring lay opinion testimony to be "rationally based on the witness's perception"

  9. Rule 602 - Need for Personal Knowledge

    Fed. R. Evid. 602   Cited 3,527 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Stating that " witness may testify only if evidence is introduced sufficient to support a finding that the witness has personal knowledge of the matter"