§
In re X.Q.L.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Kungys v. United States

    485 U.S. 759 (1988)   Cited 712 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the government must meet its burden with "clear, unequivocal, and convincing" evidence

  2. Alrefae v. Chertoff

    471 F.3d 353 (2d Cir. 2006)   Cited 110 times
    Finding that a motion that seeks rescission of an in absentia order is treated as distinct from a motion to reopen proceedings based on new evidence

  3. Johnson v. Ashcroft

    378 F.3d 164 (2d Cir. 2004)   Cited 35 times
    Holding that the BIA erred in remanding the case to the IJ for the submission of evidence of additional convictions, but explaining that DHS could seek to proffer such evidence in a new proceeding without deciding whether a new proceeding would be barred by res judicata

  4. Suzhen Meng v. Holder

    770 F.3d 1071 (2d Cir. 2014)   Cited 7 times
    In Meng v. Holder, the petitioner remained in her home country for ten months with no indications that she was imprisoned in her home, faced death threats when she left it, or delayed departure to recover from untreated injuries.

  5. Section 1003.2 - Reopening or reconsideration before the Board of Immigration Appeals

    8 C.F.R. § 1003.2   Cited 7,863 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Granting power to Board

  6. Section 1208.24 - Termination of asylum or withholding of removal or deportation

    8 C.F.R. § 1208.24   Cited 40 times
    Allowing asylum officers to terminate asylum status if they determine, after an interview, that qualifying grounds exist