§
In re Viera-Garcia

7 Cited authorities

  1. Pereira v. Sessions

    138 S. Ct. 2105 (2018)   Cited 1,068 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an NTA that omitted the "time or place of the removal proceedings" failed to comply with the requirements of § 239 and was insufficient to trigger the so-called "stop-time rule" of INA § 240A(d)

  2. Banuelos-Galviz v. Barr

    953 F.3d 1176 (10th Cir. 2020)   Cited 35 times
    Holding that, before § 1229 repealed § 1252b, an OSC did not require the date and time of the hearing

  3. Yanez-Pena v. Barr

    952 F.3d 239 (5th Cir. 2020)   Cited 29 times
    Holding that " the information statutorily required to be contained in an NTA may be supplied in more than one document, and an NTA is perfected, and the stop-time rule is triggered, when the alien receives all required information, whether in one document or more"

  4. Guadalupe v. Attorney Gen. of Am.

    951 F.3d 161 (3d Cir. 2020)   Cited 28 times
    Holding that for purposes of the stop-time rule, a deficient notice to appear cannot be "cure[d]" or "supplemented" by a subsequent notice of hearing

  5. Section 1229b - Cancellation of removal; adjustment of status

    8 U.S.C. § 1229b   Cited 5,110 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Granting the Attorney General discretion to cancel the removal of an alien who has “been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by a ... parent who is ... a United States citizen”

  6. Section 1229 - Initiation of removal proceedings

    8 U.S.C. § 1229   Cited 1,351 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing service by mail

  7. Section 1229c - Voluntary departure

    8 U.S.C. § 1229c   Cited 1,009 times
    Imposing statutory penalties for failure to depart