In re Valdez

4 Citing cases

  1. Salim v. Garland

    No. 23-9563 (10th Cir. May. 30, 2024)

    In 2019, the IJ found Ms. Salim procured asylum through willful misrepresentation. See Matter of Valdez, 27 I. &N. Dec. 496, 498 (B.I.A. 2018). Relying primarily on the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) search of Ms. Salim's Fingerprint Identification Number (FIN) and a report from the United States Visitor and Immigrant Status Identification Number (US-VISIT)

  2. Ud Din v. Garland

    72 F.4th 411 (2d Cir. 2023)   Cited 62 times
    Treating the rule as "mandatory," but also recognizing some "exception"

    While the BIA has described the presumption as a "strong" one, it recognizes that it can be "rebutted." Matter of Valdez, 27 I. & N. Dec. 496, 499 (B.I.A. 2018).

  3. Yun v. Zanotti

    Civil Action 1:20-cv-1062 (RDA/TCB) (E.D. Va. Sep. 30, 2021)

    His sworn representation “establishes a strong presumption that he [knew] the contents of the application and has assented to them.” In re Valdez, 27 I. & N. Dec. 496, 499 (BIA 2018).

  4. Qadir v. Zanotti

    Case No. 1:20cv391 (E.D. Va. Dec. 11, 2020)

    While an applicant's signature establishes only a presumption that he is aware of the application's contents, "an alien may not deliberately avoid reading the application . . . in an attempt to circumvent the presumption." Matter of Valdez, 27 I. & N. Dec. 496, 499 (BIA 2018). Qadir asks the Court not to attribute to him the lies contained in that form because Qadir actively chose not to verify the contents of the form before signing.