§
In re Truong

34 Cited authorities

  1. Lindh v. Murphy

    521 U.S. 320 (1997)   Cited 11,228 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the statutory language must be "so clear that it [can] sustain only one interpretation" favoring retroactivity

  2. Office of Personnel Management v. Richmond

    496 U.S. 414 (1990)   Cited 804 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "judicial use of the equitable doctrine of estoppel cannot grant . . . a money remedy that Congress has not authorized"

  3. Hughes Aircraft v. U.S. ex Rel. Schumer

    520 U.S. 939 (1997)   Cited 542 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the presumption against retroactivity must apply “unless Congress has clearly manifested its intent to the contrary”

  4. Landon v. Plasencia

    459 U.S. 21 (1982)   Cited 627 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such aliens are entitled to protections of Due Process Clause in exclusion proceedings

  5. Woodby v. Immigration Service

    385 U.S. 276 (1966)   Cited 753 times
    Holding that "no deportation order may be entered unless it is found by clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence that the facts alleged as grounds for deportation are true"

  6. INS v. Miranda

    459 U.S. 14 (1982)   Cited 256 times
    Holding that negligent conduct is an insufficient basis for an estoppel claim against the government

  7. Henderson v. I.N.S.

    157 F.3d 106 (2d Cir. 1998)   Cited 457 times
    Holding that a court has personal jurisdiction in a § 2241 habeas case "`so long as the custodian can be reached by service of process'" as governed by state law

  8. Wallin v. Minnesota Dept. of Corr

    526 U.S. 1004 (1999)   Cited 126 times
    Holding that a habeas corpus petition is properly filed in a district court that has personal jurisdiction over the petitioner's immediate custodian, but declining to answer the question of whether an alien's habeas corpus petition is also properly filed in a district court that has personal jurisdiction over the Attorney General

  9. U.S. Philips Corp.

    414 U.S. 5 (1973)   Cited 203 times
    Holding that estoppel did not toll the Act's statutory deadline

  10. Rosenberg v. Fleuti

    374 U.S. 449 (1963)   Cited 242 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that lawful permanent residents who travel abroad should be admitted, even if otherwise inadmissible, if their travel was "brief, casual, or innocent"

  11. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,846 times   92 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status

  12. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,987 times   78 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  13. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,159 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

  14. Section 1.1 - Applicability

    8 C.F.R. § 1.1   Cited 158 times
    Providing that LPR status terminates upon the entry of a final order of removal