In re Thomas

28 Cited authorities

  1. Ross v. Blake

    578 U.S. 632 (2016)   Cited 6,438 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, other than the requirement that a remedy be "available," the text of the Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA") "suggests no limits on an inmate's obligation to exhaust -- irrespective of any ‘special circumstances’ "
  2. Hertz Corp. v. Friend

    559 U.S. 77 (2010)   Cited 4,213 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a corporation's principal place of business is “the place where a corporation's officers direct, control, and coordinate the corporation's activities”
  3. Securities Comm'n v. Chenery Corp.

    332 U.S. 194 (1947)   Cited 4,141 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that reviewing court may consider only grounds invoked by agency
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bell Aerospace Co.

    416 U.S. 267 (1974)   Cited 752 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an agency is "not precluded from announcing new principles in an adjudicative proceeding"
  5. Pinho v. Gonzales

    432 F.3d 193 (3d Cir. 2005)   Cited 167 times
    Holding that where the record shows that the state did not answer a pending ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim before agreeing to settlement, this supports the conclusion that the settlement was reached as a result of the constitutional claim
  6. Alim v. Gonzales

    446 F.3d 1239 (11th Cir. 2006)   Cited 92 times
    Holding that a prior decision that had addressed a conviction vacated for a "rehabilitative" reason was not binding in a factual scenario where a conviction had been vacated because of a defect such as a violation of a constitutional right
  7. Resendiz-Alcaraz v. U.S. Attorney General

    383 F.3d 1262 (11th Cir. 2004)   Cited 71 times
    Upholding Board of Immigration Appeals' ruling that INA's definition of “conviction” includes state convictions expunged under a rehabilitative statute
  8. Pickering v. Gonzales

    465 F.3d 263 (6th Cir. 2006)   Cited 49 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Reversing and remanding with instructions to end removal proceedings in analogous situation
  9. Herrera-Inirio v. I.N.S.

    208 F.3d 299 (1st Cir. 2000)   Cited 56 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 1101 passes rational basis review in the context of a substantive due process challenge because it advances "the government's need for a nationally uniform definition of the term `conviction' for immigration purposes"
  10. Perez v. Cissna

    914 F.3d 846 (4th Cir. 2019)   Cited 16 times
    In Perez, the age of majority was relevant because the parties agreed that the state court did not have jurisdiction over the petitioner once he turned 18.
  11. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,344 times   92 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status
  12. Section 1738 - State and Territorial statutes and judicial proceedings; full faith and credit

    28 U.S.C. § 1738   Cited 7,518 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Referring to "[t]he Acts of the legislature" in the full faith and credit context
  13. Section 1229a - Removal proceedings

    8 U.S.C. § 1229a   Cited 6,277 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Granting a noncitizen the right to file one motion to reopen and providing that “the motion to reopen shall be filed within 90 days of the date of entry of a final administrative order of removal”
  14. Section 16-5-23.1 - Battery

    Ga. Code § 16-5-23.1   Cited 253 times
    Defining "battery" as "intentionally caus[ing] substantial physical harm or visible bodily harm to another"