§
In re Tejwani

9 Cited authorities

  1. Roberts v. United States

    445 U.S. 552 (1980)   Cited 766 times
    Holding that "the District Court properly considered, as one factor in imposing sentence, the petitioner's refusal to cooperate with officials investigating a criminal conspiracy in which he was a confessed participant"

  2. Rodriguez v. Gonzales

    451 F.3d 60 (2d Cir. 2006)   Cited 97 times
    Holding that fraud or deceit with "intent to impair the efficiency and lawful functioning of the government" was "sufficient to categorize a crime as a CIMT"

  3. Itani v. Ashcroft

    298 F.3d 1213 (11th Cir. 2002)   Cited 58 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that misprision of a felony is a crime involving moral turpitude because it "necessarily involves an affirmative act of concealment or participation in a felony, behavior that runs contrary to accepted societal duties and involves dishonest or fraudulent activity"

  4. Carty v. Ashcroft

    395 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir. 2005)   Cited 51 times
    Holding that a statute prohibiting conduct with "specific intent to evade a tax" did not contain, as an essential element of the offense: an intent to defraud

  5. De Leon-Reynoso v. Ashcroft

    293 F.3d 633 (3d Cir. 2002)   Cited 53 times
    Holding this disparity does not violate Equal Protection Clause

  6. Notash v. Gonzales

    427 F.3d 693 (9th Cir. 2005)   Cited 39 times
    Holding that an act done deliberately and with knowledge does not necessarily involve the "evil intent" required for CIMT purposes

  7. Padilla v. Gonzales

    397 F.3d 1016 (7th Cir. 2005)   Cited 35 times
    Holding that "knowingly furnishing false information" to police to prevent apprehension is a CIMT

  8. Fomby-Denson v. Dept. of Army

    247 F.3d 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2001)   Cited 36 times
    Holding that a contract barring an agency from reporting criminal behavior would be against public policy

  9. Section 470.10 - Money laundering in the third degree

    N.Y. Penal Law § 470.10   Cited 12 times

    A person is guilty of money laundering in the third degree when: 1. Knowing that the property involved in one or more financial transactions represents: (a) the proceeds of the criminal sale of a controlled substance, he or she conducts one or more such financial transactions which in fact involve the proceeds of the criminal sale of a controlled substance: (i) With intent to: (A) promote the carrying on of specified criminal conduct; or (B) engage in conduct constituting a felony as set forth in