§
IN RE SHAH

12 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Utah Constr. Co.

    384 U.S. 394 (1966)   Cited 1,252 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts can give preclusive effect to certain administrative proceedings

  2. Venkatraman v. REI Systems, Inc.

    417 F.3d 418 (4th Cir. 2005)   Cited 542 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a miscarriage of justice had not occurred, so as to require appellate review, when the district court failed to consider a cause of action not presented to it

  3. U.S. v. Ramirez

    420 F.3d 134 (2d Cir. 2005)   Cited 86 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the essential conduct element of mail fraud “encompasses the overt act of putting a letter into the postoffice”

  4. Gadda v. Ashcroft

    377 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2004)   Cited 79 times
    Rejecting as without merit an attorney's argument that Supreme Court of California lacked jurisdiction to disbar him based on conduct in federal courts

  5. Chauffeur's Training School v. Spellings

    478 F.3d 117 (2d Cir. 2007)   Cited 27 times
    Affirming the Department of Education's assessment of liability where its statistical calculation and analysis was explained in record and “[t]he School was free to offer competing statistical evidence (which it did not do) and to argue any claimed defects in the Department's analysis”

  6. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,836 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status

  7. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,979 times   74 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  8. Section 1184 - Admission of nonimmigrants

    8 U.S.C. § 1184   Cited 628 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Creating exceptions to caps, including separate quota of 20,000 for nonimmigrants with master's or higher degree

  9. Section 214.2 - Special requirements for admission, extension, and maintenance of status

    8 C.F.R. § 214.2   Cited 462 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Restating cap in 8 U.S.C. § 1184(g)(l)

  10. Section 655.700 - What statutory provisions govern the employment of H-1B, H-1B1, and E-3 nonimmigrants and how do employers apply for H-1B, H-1B1, and E-3 visas?

    20 C.F.R. § 655.700   Cited 23 times

    Under the E-3 visa program, the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), as amended, permits certain nonimmigrant treaty aliens to be admitted to the United States solely to perform services in a specialty occupation (INA section 101(a)(15)(E)(iii)). Under the H-1B1 visa program, the INA permits nonimmigrant professionals in specialty occupations from countries with which the United States has entered into certain agreements that are identified in section 214(g)(8)(A) of the INA to temporarily enter

  11. Section 1292.3 - Conduct for practitioners and recognized organizations-rules and procedures

    8 C.F.R. § 1292.3   Cited 8 times

    Practitioners, as defined in § 1003.101(b) of this chapter, and recognized organizations are subject to the imposition of sanctions as provided in 8 CFR part 1003, subpart G, § 1003.101 et seq., and 8 CFR 292.3 (pertaining to practice before DHS). 8 C.F.R. §1292.3 81 FR 92367 , Dec. 19, 2016 81 FR 92367 , 1/18/2017

  12. Section 1003.106 - Right to be heard and disposition

    8 C.F.R. § 1003.106

    (a)Right to be heard - (1)Summary disciplinary proceedings. A practitioner who is subject to summary disciplinary proceedings pursuant to § 1003.103(b) must make a prima facie showing to the Board in his or her answer that there is a material issue of fact in dispute with regard to the basis for summary disciplinary proceedings, or with one or more of the exceptions set forth in § 1003.103(b)(2)(i) through (iii). If the practitioner files a timely answer and the Board determines that there is a material