Holding that no due process violation exists unless "the proceeding was so fundamentally unfair that the alien was prevented from reasonably presenting his case"
Declining to consider facial vagueness challenge where alien had not identified a constitutionally-protected right compromised by the immigration statute at issue in any of the prior proceedings
58 Cal.App.4th 159 (Cal. Ct. App. 1997) Cited 65 times
Holding evidence of past violence perpetrated on victim by defendant was clearly relevant to his intent to place victim in fear for her safety in prosecution for stalking and harassment
Holding that a guilty plea to a complaint charging conjunctively multiple violations of a statute does not establish the defendant was guilty under a specific sub-section of the statute
8 U.S.C. § 1229b Cited 5,075 times 24 Legal Analyses
Granting the Attorney General discretion to cancel the removal of an alien who has “been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by a ... parent who is ... a United States citizen”