§
In re Saint John

13 Cited authorities

  1. INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca

    480 U.S. 421 (1987)   Cited 2,407 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the phrase "well-founded fear," which is also found in 8 U.S.C. § 1101, is ambiguous

  2. K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.

    486 U.S. 281 (1988)   Cited 805 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding a C.F.R. provision invalid because it conflicted with the unequivocal language of the statute

  3. Woodby v. Immigration Service

    385 U.S. 276 (1966)   Cited 753 times
    Holding that "no deportation order may be entered unless it is found by clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence that the facts alleged as grounds for deportation are true"

  4. Galvan v. Press

    347 U.S. 522 (1954)   Cited 389 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while aliens may receive procedural due process, the court's ability to review the substantive policy of immigration statutes is limited to review for rationality

  5. Francis v. Immigration Naturalization Serv

    532 F.2d 268 (2d Cir. 1976)   Cited 249 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "fundamental fairness" dictates that § 212(c) apply to resident aliens in deportation as well as exclusion proceedings

  6. Buitrago-Cuesta v. I.N.S.

    7 F.3d 291 (2d Cir. 1993)   Cited 69 times
    Holding that time spent in custody during the course of a hearing will be counted for purposes of rendering incarcerated alien ineligible for section 212(c) relief

  7. Cato v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    84 F.3d 597 (2d Cir. 1996)   Cited 31 times
    Finding that section 241 firearms offenses are not waivable under section 212(c) since they are not among the enumerated offenses within section 212

  8. Giusto v. I.N.S.

    9 F.3d 8 (2d Cir. 1993)   Cited 31 times
    Holding that 28 U.S.C. § 1182(c)'s making discretionary relief unavailable did not violate equal protection rights

  9. Bedoya-Valencia v. I.N.S.

    6 F.3d 891 (2d Cir. 1993)   Cited 27 times
    Holding that, "[a]t least with respect to entry without inspection, a ground of deportation that could not conceivably have such an analogue, there is no basis in statutory text or legislative purpose to preclude [this] modest extension of the Francis rule."

  10. U.S. v. Koziel

    954 F.2d 831 (2d Cir. 1992)   Cited 24 times
    Holding that, after repeal of JRAD statute, sentencing court could not recommend against deportation of alien whose criminal conduct occurred prior to repeal

  11. Section 922 - Unlawful acts

    18 U.S.C. § 922   Cited 62,815 times   187 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "even before the sale of a firearm, the gun, its component parts, ammunition, and the raw materials from which they are made have considerably moved in interstate commerce"

  12. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,900 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  13. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,159 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable