In re Robles-Urrea

28 Cited authorities

Branzburg v. Hayes
408 U.S. 665 (1972) Cited 1,808 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that government need not “demonstrate some ‘compelling need’ for a newsman's testimony”
Fernandez-Vargas v. Gonzales
548 U.S. 30 (2006) Cited 403 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that Section 1231's "removal period" does "not begin until the date of the Court's final order"
Roberts v. United States
445 U.S. 552 (1980) Cited 749 times
Holding that, in determining a sentence, the district court may consider a defendant's failure to cooperate with an ongoing investigation of the criminal scheme of which the defendant was a part
Ram v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
243 F.3d 510 (9th Cir. 2001) Cited 517 times
Holding that Congressional line-drawing under NACARA is rationally related to a diplomatic interest
Salmi v. Secretary of Health Human Services
774 F.2d 685 (6th Cir. 1985) Cited 535 times
Holding that prior published opinions of this Court remain binding on future panels "unless an inconsistent decision of the United States Supreme Court requires modification of the decision or this Court sitting en banc overrules the prior decision"
Itani v. Ashcroft
298 F.3d 1213 (11th Cir. 2002) Cited 56 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that misprision of a felony is a crime involving moral turpitude because it "necessarily involves an affirmative act of concealment or participation in a felony, behavior that runs contrary to accepted societal duties and involves dishonest or fraudulent activity"
Smalley v. Ashcroft
354 F.3d 332 (5th Cir. 2003) Cited 51 times
Holding that money laundering is a crime involving moral turpitude because it requires that the defendant intentionally conceal the proceeds of illegal drug sales
Grageda v. U.S. I.N.S.
12 F.3d 919 (9th Cir. 1993) Cited 63 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that “spousal abuse under section 273.5 is a crime of moral turpitude”
Notash v. Gonzales
427 F.3d 693 (9th Cir. 2005) Cited 39 times
Holding that an act done deliberately and with knowledge does not necessarily involve the "evil intent" required for CIMT purposes
Padilla v. Gonzales
397 F.3d 1016 (7th Cir. 2005) Cited 35 times
Holding that "knowingly furnishing false information" to police to prevent apprehension is a CIMT
Section 846 - Attempt and conspiracy
21 U.S.C. § 846 Cited 44,082 times 19 Legal Analyses
Holding each conspirator responsible for the quantity of drugs distributed by the conspiracy
Section 1101 - Definitions
8 U.S.C. § 1101 Cited 16,365 times 91 Legal Analyses
Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status
Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens
8 U.S.C. § 1182 Cited 9,718 times 66 Legal Analyses
Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"
Section 1231 - Detention and removal of aliens ordered removed
8 U.S.C. § 1231 Cited 7,806 times 13 Legal Analyses
Concluding that once petitioner's removal order was reinstated, he was no longer eligible for "relief" in the form of adjustment of status-even if he could obtain a Form I-212 waiver
Section 1229b - Cancellation of removal; adjustment of status
8 U.S.C. § 1229b Cited 5,083 times 24 Legal Analyses
Granting the Attorney General discretion to cancel the removal of an alien who has “been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by a ... parent who is ... a United States citizen”
Section 4 - Misprision of felony
18 U.S.C. § 4 Cited 1,352 times 10 Legal Analyses
Subjecting to criminal penalties anyone with "knowledge ... of a felony" and who "conceals" that felony from authorities
Section 32 - Accessory to felony by harboring, concealing, or aiding principal
Cal. Pen. Code § 32 Cited 885 times 1 Legal Analyses
Requiring that the offender act “with the intent that principal may avoid or escape from arrest, trial, conviction or punishment”
Section 1003.2 - Reopening or reconsideration before the Board of Immigration Appeals
8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 Cited 7,771 times 7 Legal Analyses
Granting power to Board

In re Robles-Urrea

28 Cited authorities

Holding that government need not “demonstrate some ‘compelling need’ for a newsman's testimony”

Holding that Section 1231's "removal period" does "not begin until the date of the Court's final order"

Holding that, in determining a sentence, the district court may consider a defendant's failure to cooperate with an ongoing investigation of the criminal scheme of which the defendant was a part

Holding that Congressional line-drawing under NACARA is rationally related to a diplomatic interest

Holding that prior published opinions of this Court remain binding on future panels "unless an inconsistent decision of the United States Supreme Court requires modification of the decision or this Court sitting en banc overrules the prior decision"

Holding that misprision of a felony is a crime involving moral turpitude because it "necessarily involves an affirmative act of concealment or participation in a felony, behavior that runs contrary to accepted societal duties and involves dishonest or fraudulent activity"

Holding that money laundering is a crime involving moral turpitude because it requires that the defendant intentionally conceal the proceeds of illegal drug sales

Holding that “spousal abuse under section 273.5 is a crime of moral turpitude”

Holding that an act done deliberately and with knowledge does not necessarily involve the "evil intent" required for CIMT purposes

Holding that "knowingly furnishing false information" to police to prevent apprehension is a CIMT

Holding each conspirator responsible for the quantity of drugs distributed by the conspiracy

Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status

Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

Concluding that once petitioner's removal order was reinstated, he was no longer eligible for "relief" in the form of adjustment of status-even if he could obtain a Form I-212 waiver

Granting the Attorney General discretion to cancel the removal of an alien who has “been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by a ... parent who is ... a United States citizen”

Subjecting to criminal penalties anyone with "knowledge ... of a felony" and who "conceals" that felony from authorities

Requiring that the offender act “with the intent that principal may avoid or escape from arrest, trial, conviction or punishment”

Granting power to Board