In re Rivera-Mendoza

14 Cited authorities

  1. Moncrieffe v. Holder

    569 U.S. 184 (2013)   Cited 1,377 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that sharing marijuana not an aggravated felony
  2. Fregozo v. Holder

    576 F.3d 1030 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 54 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that California’s misdemeanor child endangerment statute was not a crime of child abuse under the INA because it did not require "any particular likelihood of harm to a child"
  3. State v. Paragon

    195 Or. App. 265 (Or. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 26 times
    In Paragon, the defendants left a seven-year-old at home alone with her nine-year-old brother for 45 minutes while they went to a doctor for a medical emergency.
  4. Buchwalter-Drumm v. State

    288 Or. App. 64 (Or. Ct. App. 2017)   Cited 8 times
    Reciting summary judgment standard
  5. Alvarez-Cerriteno v. Sessions

    899 F.3d 774 (9th Cir. 2018)   Cited 7 times
    Deferring to the Board's interpretation
  6. Morehouse v. Haynes

    350 Or. 318 (Or. 2011)   Cited 12 times
    Holding that a dispute of material fact existed as to whether the plaintiff had driven recklessly, for purposes of a civil claim, where he crossed over a road's center line while driving 45 to 50 miles per hour on a curve with a suggested speed of 25 miles per hour and chose that moment to adjust his radio, given defendant's familiarity with the road and "the cautionary signs and the physical features of the curve"
  7. State v. Obeidi

    211 Or. App. 377 (Or. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 1 times

    Nos. Washington County Circuit Court D043078M; A127189. Argued and submitted September 27, 2006. March 14, 2007. Gayle Nachtigal, Judge. Mary-Shannon Storey, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief were Peter A. Ozanne, Executive Director, and Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Legal Services Division, Office of Public Defense Services. Katherine H. Waldo, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General

  8. State v. Goff

    297 Or. 635 (Or. 1984)   Cited 11 times
    Explaining distinction
  9. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,902 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"
  10. Section 1227 - Deportable aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1227   Cited 8,028 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Granting this discretion to the Attorney General
  11. Section 1229b - Cancellation of removal; adjustment of status

    8 U.S.C. § 1229b   Cited 5,203 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Granting the Attorney General discretion to cancel the removal of an alien who has “been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by a ... parent who is ... a United States citizen”
  12. Section 161.085 - Definitions with respect to culpability

    ORS § 161.085   Cited 389 times
    Defining intent
  13. Section 1324d - Civil penalties for failure to depart

    8 U.S.C. § 1324d   Cited 16 times
    Providing civil penalties for similar conduct
  14. Section 280.53 - Civil monetary penalties inflation adjustment

    8 C.F.R. § 280.53   1 Legal Analyses

    (a)Statutory authority. In accordance with the requirements of the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990, Public Law 101-410 , 104 Stat. 890, as amended by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015, Public Law 114-74 , Sec. 701, 129 Stat . 599, the civil monetary penalties listed in paragraph (b) of this section are adjusted as provided in paragraph (b). (b)Adjustment of penalties. For violations occurring on or before November 2, 2015, the penalty