§
In re P.B.B.

28 Cited authorities

  1. Mathis v. United States

    136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016)   Cited 4,449 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a court employing the categorical approach "looks to a limited class of documents"

  2. Moncrieffe v. Holder

    569 U.S. 184 (2013)   Cited 1,384 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that sharing marijuana not an aggravated felony

  3. Blockburger v. United States

    284 U.S. 299 (1932)   Cited 9,869 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the test for whether two offenses are distinct for double jeopardy purposes is "whether each provision requires proof of a fact which the other does not"

  4. Currier v. Virginia

    138 S. Ct. 2144 (2018)   Cited 134 times
    Holding that a defendant's strategic choice about whether to testify is "not the same as no choice, and the Constitution does not forbid requiring a litigant to make [it]"

  5. United States v. Martinez-Lopez

    864 F.3d 1034 (9th Cir. 2017)   Cited 118 times
    Holding that a similar California controlled substance statute is divisible with respect to the listed substances

  6. Alvarado v. Holder

    759 F.3d 1121 (9th Cir. 2014)   Cited 100 times
    Holding that we could not consider the charging papers where the original charge was for possession but where the plea for attempted possession referred to "Modified Count One"

  7. Harbin v. Sessions

    860 F.3d 58 (2d Cir. 2017)   Cited 73 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that jury instructions did not establish that statute was divisible because they included a blank with the word "specify"

  8. United States v. Henderson

    841 F.3d 623 (3d Cir. 2016)   Cited 69 times
    Holding that an alternative list of substances provides separate elements in part because the statute provides different maximum sentences for violators

  9. Lorenzo v. Sessions

    902 F.3d 930 (9th Cir. 2018)   Cited 34 times
    Reviewing a BIA decision de novo because the BIA was not entitled to deference for its interpretation of Supreme Court guidance on the categorical approach

  10. Guillen v. U.S. Attorney Gen.

    910 F.3d 1174 (11th Cir. 2018)   Cited 21 times
    Holding that § 893.13 is divisible by the identity of the substance involved

  11. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,778 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status

  12. Section 1158 - Asylum

    8 U.S.C. § 1158   Cited 10,716 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding a "pattern or practice" of persecution requires it be "systemic, pervasive, or organized"

  13. Section 1227 - Deportable aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1227   Cited 8,054 times   42 Legal Analyses
    Granting this discretion to the Attorney General

  14. Section 802 - Definitions

    21 U.S.C. § 802   Cited 4,080 times   85 Legal Analyses
    Excluding hemp from the schedules

  15. Section 812 - Schedules of controlled substances

    21 U.S.C. § 812   Cited 2,889 times   80 Legal Analyses
    Criminalizing heroin

  16. Section 13-3407 - Possession, use, administration, acquisition, sale, manufacture or transportation of dangerous drugs; classification

    Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-3407   Cited 276 times
    Setting forth minimum, presumptive, and maximum sentences in "calendar years" for offenses involving methamphetamine

  17. Section 1324d - Civil penalties for failure to depart

    8 U.S.C. § 1324d   Cited 16 times
    Providing civil penalties for similar conduct

  18. Section 280.53 - Civil monetary penalties inflation adjustment

    8 C.F.R. § 280.53   1 Legal Analyses

    (a)Statutory authority. In accordance with the requirements of the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990, Public Law 101-410 , 104 Stat. 890, as amended by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015, Public Law 114-74 , Sec. 701, 129 Stat . 599, the civil monetary penalties listed in paragraph (b) of this section are adjusted as provided in paragraph (b). (b)Adjustment of penalties. For violations occurring on or before November 2, 2015, the penalty