In re P-L-P

3 Cited authorities

  1. Ramirez-Osorio v. I.N.S.

    745 F.2d 937 (5th Cir. 1984)   Cited 44 times
    Holding that the INS provided sufficient process under Mathews v. Eldridge by informing only those aliens who the agency believed could be subject to persecution if returned home of their right to petition for asylum
  2. Section 208.14 - Approval, denial, referral, or dismissal of application

    8 C.F.R. § 208.14   Cited 92 times
    Denying asylum to applicants firmly resettled
  3. Section 208.2 - Jurisdiction

    8 C.F.R. § 208.2   Cited 84 times
    Limiting the scope of review in asylum-only proceedings to "a determination of whether the alien is eligible for asylum or withholding or deferral of removal, and whether asylum shall be granted in the exercise of discretion."