In re Ordaz-Gonzalez

23 Cited authorities

Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.
519 U.S. 337 (1997) Cited 2,521 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding that the term “employees” carries a different meaning in different sections of Title VII
Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
529 U.S. 120 (2000) Cited 1,566 times 46 Legal Analyses
Holding that Congress had not yet empowered the FDA to regulate tobacco products
K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.
486 U.S. 281 (1988) Cited 805 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding a C.F.R. provision invalid because it conflicted with the unequivocal language of the statute
Sprietsma v. Mercury Marine
537 U.S. 51 (2002) Cited 335 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Coast Guard's decision not to regulate propeller guards did not impliedly pre-empt petitioner's tort claims
Negusie v. Holder
555 U.S. 511 (2009) Cited 215 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that Fedorenko's rule that voluntariness is irrelevant to culpability with respect to the DPA's persecutor bar need not be applied to the analogous INA persecutor bar
F. Hofpmann-La Roche Ltd. v. Empagran S. A.
542 U.S. 155 (2004) Cited 212 times 17 Legal Analyses
Holding domestic effects exception does not apply where "price-fixing conduct significantly and adversely affects both customers outside the United States and customers within the United States, but the adverse foreign effect is independent of any adverse domestic effect"
In re Cardelucci
285 F.3d 1231 (9th Cir. 2002) Cited 129 times 13 Legal Analyses
Holding that when a debtor is solvent, the creditors are entitled to receive post-petition interest at the legal rate under a chapter 11 plan of reorganization
Popa v. Holder
571 F.3d 890 (9th Cir. 2009) Cited 76 times
Holding that a notice of deportation hearing sent by regular mail to the last address provided by an individual satisfies the requirements of due process
Abdisalan v. Holder
774 F.3d 517 (9th Cir. 2014) Cited 37 times
Holding that in mixed decisions in which the Board affirms some decisions by the immigration judge but remands others for further consideration, "no final order of removal exists until all administrative proceedings have concluded"
Cortez-Felipe v. INS
245 F.3d 1054 (9th Cir. 2001) Cited 55 times
Holding that the IJ and BIA lack authority to review discretionary decisions regarding when and whether to initiate removal proceedings
Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens
8 U.S.C. § 1182 Cited 9,900 times 69 Legal Analyses
Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"
Section 1229a - Removal proceedings
8 U.S.C. § 1229a Cited 6,391 times 8 Legal Analyses
Granting a noncitizen the right to file one motion to reopen and providing that “the motion to reopen shall be filed within 90 days of the date of entry of a final administrative order of removal”
Section 1229b - Cancellation of removal; adjustment of status
8 U.S.C. § 1229b Cited 5,200 times 24 Legal Analyses
Granting the Attorney General discretion to cancel the removal of an alien who has “been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by a ... parent who is ... a United States citizen”
Section 1229 - Initiation of removal proceedings
8 U.S.C. § 1229 Cited 1,373 times 6 Legal Analyses
Authorizing service by mail
Section 1254 - Repealed
8 U.S.C. § 1254 Cited 1,132 times 1 Legal Analyses
Describing suspension-of-deportation eligibility
Section 1003.14 - Jurisdiction and commencement of proceedings
8 C.F.R. § 1003.14 Cited 485 times 1 Legal Analyses
Recognizing that removal proceedings commence "when a charging document is filed with the Immigration court"

In re Ordaz-Gonzalez

23 Cited authorities

Holding that the term “employees” carries a different meaning in different sections of Title VII

Holding that Congress had not yet empowered the FDA to regulate tobacco products

Holding a C.F.R. provision invalid because it conflicted with the unequivocal language of the statute

Holding that the Coast Guard's decision not to regulate propeller guards did not impliedly pre-empt petitioner's tort claims

Holding that Fedorenko's rule that voluntariness is irrelevant to culpability with respect to the DPA's persecutor bar need not be applied to the analogous INA persecutor bar

Holding domestic effects exception does not apply where "price-fixing conduct significantly and adversely affects both customers outside the United States and customers within the United States, but the adverse foreign effect is independent of any adverse domestic effect"

Holding that when a debtor is solvent, the creditors are entitled to receive post-petition interest at the legal rate under a chapter 11 plan of reorganization

Holding that a notice of deportation hearing sent by regular mail to the last address provided by an individual satisfies the requirements of due process

Holding that in mixed decisions in which the Board affirms some decisions by the immigration judge but remands others for further consideration, "no final order of removal exists until all administrative proceedings have concluded"

Holding that the IJ and BIA lack authority to review discretionary decisions regarding when and whether to initiate removal proceedings

Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

Granting a noncitizen the right to file one motion to reopen and providing that “the motion to reopen shall be filed within 90 days of the date of entry of a final administrative order of removal”

Granting the Attorney General discretion to cancel the removal of an alien who has “been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by a ... parent who is ... a United States citizen”

Authorizing service by mail

Describing suspension-of-deportation eligibility

Recognizing that removal proceedings commence "when a charging document is filed with the Immigration court"