§
In re Noble

42 Cited authorities

  1. Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Res. Def. Council

    467 U.S. 837 (1984)   Cited 16,016 times   500 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts "must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress"

  2. Mathews v. Eldridge

    424 U.S. 319 (1976)   Cited 15,738 times   42 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a procedure based on written submissions was adequate because it included safeguards against mistake including that the agency informed the recipient of its tentative assessment and the evidence supporting it and an opportunity was then afforded the recipient to submit additional evidence "enabling him to challenge directly the accuracy of information in his file as well as the correctness of the agency's tentative conclusions"

  3. Landgraf v. USI Film Prods.

    511 U.S. 244 (1994)   Cited 3,796 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a statute may apply retroactively when "clear congressional intent favor such a result"

  4. INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca

    480 U.S. 421 (1987)   Cited 2,390 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the phrase "well-founded fear," which is also found in 8 U.S.C. § 1101, is ambiguous

  5. United States v. Turkette

    452 U.S. 576 (1981)   Cited 2,718 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a RICO enterprise must exist "separate and apart" from the pattern of racketeering activity

  6. Addington v. Texas

    441 U.S. 418 (1979)   Cited 2,628 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the individual's interest in the outcome of a civil commitment proceeding is of such weight and gravity that due process requires the state to justify confinement by proof more substantial than a mere preponderance of the evidence"

  7. Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital

    488 U.S. 204 (1988)   Cited 1,716 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts will not defer to an agency's litigating position where it contradicts the agency's prior “regulations, rulings, or administrative practice”

  8. Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.

    514 U.S. 211 (1995)   Cited 885 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding legislated invalidation of final judgments to be categorically unconstitutional

  9. K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.

    486 U.S. 281 (1988)   Cited 791 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding a C.F.R. provision invalid because it conflicted with the unequivocal language of the statute

  10. Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Ass'n

    485 U.S. 439 (1988)   Cited 788 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an adherent was not entitled to challenge a third party's actions that offended his beliefs

  11. Section 1252 - Judicial review of orders of removal

    8 U.S.C. § 1252   Cited 42,528 times   36 Legal Analyses
    Holding court had no jurisdiction to review "any judgment regarding the granting of relief under section . . . 1229b"

  12. Section 1226 - Apprehension and detention of aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1226   Cited 3,160 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Ruling that no court may set aside an immigration judge's "discretionary judgment any action or decision . . . regarding the detention or release of any alien or the grant, revocation, or denial of bond or parole"

  13. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,154 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable