In re Moradel

24 Cited authorities

  1. Barnhart v. Thomas

    540 U.S. 20 (2003)   Cited 4,599 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that at step four, in concluding that a claimant may return to her past relevant work, an ALJ need not investigate whether that work exists in significant numbers in the national economy, noting that the inquiry into the "national economy" is reserved for step five
  2. Moncrieffe v. Holder

    569 U.S. 184 (2013)   Cited 1,390 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that sharing marijuana not an aggravated felony
  3. Pereira v. Sessions

    138 S. Ct. 2105 (2018)   Cited 1,078 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an NTA that omitted the "time or place of the removal proceedings" failed to comply with the requirements of § 239 and was insufficient to trigger the so-called "stop-time rule" of INA § 240A(d)
  4. Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder

    560 U.S. 563 (2010)   Cited 971 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts should look to the “conviction itself,” rather than a crime or sentence with which the defendant “could have been” charged or assigned, in determining whether a previous conviction is an aggravated felony under the INA
  5. Paroline v. United States

    572 U.S. 434 (2014)   Cited 665 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that restitution orders under 18 U.S.C. § 2259 are unlawful absent a proximate-cause analysis
  6. Nijhawan v. Holder

    557 U.S. 29 (2009)   Cited 592 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the fraud-and-deceit provision in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(M) calls for a "circumstance-specific" approach, not a categorical approach
  7. Jama v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement

    543 U.S. 335 (2005)   Cited 442 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Congress could not have ratified a “settled construction” of a statute, because there was no “judicial consensus so broad and unquestioned that we must presume Congress knew of and endorsed it”
  8. Lockhart v. United States

    577 U.S. 347 (2016)   Cited 256 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding under the last-antecedent canon, "a limiting clause or phrase . . . should ordinarily be read as modifying only the noun or phrase that it immediately follows."
  9. Pereida v. Wilkinson

    141 S. Ct. 754 (2021)   Cited 163 times
    Holding that noncitizen seeking cancellation of removal bears burden of showing which subsection of multipart statute was his crime of conviction
  10. Mellouli v. Lynch

    575 U.S. 798 (2015)   Cited 116 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Determining minimum conduct at the time of petitioner's conviction
  11. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,871 times   92 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status
  12. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,996 times   79 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"
  13. Section 1227 - Deportable aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1227   Cited 8,085 times   42 Legal Analyses
    Granting this discretion to the Attorney General
  14. Section 1255 - Adjustment of status of nonimmigrant to that of person admitted for permanent residence

    8 U.S.C. § 1255   Cited 2,922 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Listing classes of nonimmigrants, such as students and tourists
  15. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,160 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable
  16. Section 1254a - Temporary protected status

    8 U.S.C. § 1254a   Cited 248 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Granting the right to live and work in the United States to citizens of designated countries afflicted by war, natural disaster, or extraordinary and temporary conditions
  17. Section 1160 - Special agricultural workers

    8 U.S.C. § 1160   Cited 245 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Setting procedures for adjustment of status of certain noncitizens
  18. Section 1245.1 - Eligibility

    8 C.F.R. § 1245.1   Cited 114 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Providing that "[a]ny alien who was not admitted or paroled following inspection by an immigration officer" is "ineligible to apply for adjustment of status to that of a lawful permanent resident alien"