§

In re Montoya-Silva

Interim Decision #3781 (B.I.A. 2013)
In re Montoya-Silva

9 Cited authorities

  1. Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Res. Def. Council

    467 U.S. 837 (1984)   Cited 16,198 times   616 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts "must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress"

  2. Holder v. Carlos Martinez Gutierrez. Eric H. Holder

    566 U.S. 583 (2012)   Cited 86 times
    Holding that a child “must meet [§ 1229b(a)'s] requirements on his own, without counting a parent's years of residence or immigration status”

  3. Cuevas-Gaspar v. Gonzales

    430 F.3d 1013 (9th Cir. 2005)   Cited 117 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “for purposes of satisfying the seven-years of continuous residence ‘after having been admitted in any status' required for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b, a parent's admission for permanent resident status is imputed to the parent's unemancipated minor children residing with the parent”

  4. Samayoa-Martinez v. Holder

    558 F.3d 897 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 66 times
    Holding that the advisal requirements under section 287.3(c) do not attach until formal proceedings are initiated by filing the notice to appear in immigration court

  5. Mercado-Zazueta v. Holder

    580 F.3d 1102 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 34 times
    Holding that imputation applies for purposes of the five-year permanent residence requirement

  6. Sawyers v. Holder

    684 F.3d 911 (9th Cir. 2012)   Cited 11 times
    Rejecting imputation because Cuevas–Gaspar and Mercado–Zazueta were "no longer valid precedent"

  7. Mojica v. Holder

    689 F.3d 1133 (9th Cir. 2012)   Cited 1 times

    No. 07–73098. 2012-08-10 Lisbeth Duque MOJICA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. Dario Aguirre, Esquire, Aguirre Law Group, Denver, CO, Michael Franquinha, Aguirre Law Group APC, Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner. Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Jeffery R. Leist, Trial, Ernesto Horacio Molina, Jr., Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. PER CURIAM:

  8. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,900 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  9. Section 1229b - Cancellation of removal; adjustment of status

    8 U.S.C. § 1229b   Cited 5,200 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Granting the Attorney General discretion to cancel the removal of an alien who has “been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by a ... parent who is ... a United States citizen”