In re M-S

5 Cited authorities

  1. Gandarillas-Zambrana v. Board of Immigration Appeals

    44 F.3d 1251 (4th Cir. 1995)   Cited 25 times
    Concluding that IJ's questioning in deportation hearing did not violate due process because it did not deprive petitioner of "fair and meaningful hearing"
  2. Burgos-Abril v. I.N.S.

    58 F.3d 475 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 11 times
    Concluding that no due process violation occurred when alien "was given a full and fair opportunity to be represented by counsel at the deportation proceedings, to prepare her application for § 212(c) relief, and to present testimony and other evidence in support of her application."
  3. Section 1158 - Asylum

    8 U.S.C. § 1158   Cited 10,717 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding a "pattern or practice" of persecution requires it be "systemic, pervasive, or organized"
  4. Section 208.13 - Establishing asylum eligibility

    8 C.F.R. § 208.13   Cited 1,791 times
    Recognizing that applicant can meet burden for well-founded fear of persecution by demonstrating a reasonable possibility of persecution against himself as an individual or a pattern or practice of persecution against persons in a group to which he belongs
  5. Section 208.14 - Approval, denial, referral, or dismissal of application

    8 C.F.R. § 208.14   Cited 92 times
    Denying asylum to applicants firmly resettled