Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Res. Def. Council

Holding that courts "must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress"

Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. Dedeaux

Holding that civil enforcement scheme codified at § 502 is not to be supplemented by state law remedies

INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca

Holding that the phrase "well-founded fear," which is also found in 8 U.S.C. § 1101, is ambiguous

United Savings Assn. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest

Holding that § 506(b) “deni [es] ... postpetition interest to undersecured creditors,” and recognizing “an apparent anomaly” that when a debtor proves solvent, 11 U.S.C. § 726 provides for post-petition interest on unsecured claims “but not on the secured portion of undersecured creditors' claims,” but concluding that these particular “inequitable effects ... are entirely avoidable, since an undersecured creditor is entitled to ‘surrender or waive his security and prove his entire claim as an unsecured one’ ”

INS v. Doherty

Holding that a regulation with the same formulation established a necessary but not sufficient condition

K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.

Holding a C.F.R. provision invalid because it conflicted with the unequivocal language of the statute

Kungys v. United States

Holding that the government must meet its burden with "clear, unequivocal, and convincing" evidence

Colautti v. Franklin

Holding an abortion statute that imposed strict liability was impermissibly vague where it was "unclear whether the statute imports a purely subjective standard, or whether it imposes a mixed subjective and objective standard."

Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jong Ha Wang

Holding that where allegations are "unsupported by affidavit" they cannot support a motion to reopen because this would constitute a circumvention of the affidavit requirement in the regulations

Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott Dunning

Holding that the FDA has primary jurisdiction to determine that a product is a ‘new drug,’ subject to review in the court of appeals

Section 1252 - Judicial review of orders of removal

Holding court had no jurisdiction to review "any judgment regarding the granting of relief under section . . . 1229b"

Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

Section 1229a - Removal proceedings

Granting a noncitizen the right to file one motion to reopen and providing that “the motion to reopen shall be filed within 90 days of the date of entry of a final administrative order of removal”

Section 1255 - Adjustment of status of nonimmigrant to that of person admitted for permanent residence

Listing classes of nonimmigrants, such as students and tourists

Section 1251 - Transferred

Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

Section 1252b - Repealed

Stating that time-and-place information could be provided "in the order to show cause or otherwise"

Section 1256 - Rescission of adjustment of status; effect upon naturalized citizen

Providing for rescission of adjusted status if within five years it appears the alien "was not in fact eligible for such adjustment of status" when it was granted

Section 245.2 - Application

Granting USCIS authority to adjudicate applications for adjustment of status outside of removal proceedings

Section 208.14 - Approval, denial, referral, or dismissal of application

Denying asylum to applicants firmly resettled

Section 241.2 - Warrant of removal