In re M-H-Z

19 Cited authorities

  1. INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca

    480 U.S. 421 (1987)   Cited 2,410 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the phrase "well-founded fear," which is also found in 8 U.S.C. § 1101, is ambiguous
  2. Russello v. United States

    464 U.S. 16 (1983)   Cited 2,128 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where "Congress includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it in another section of the same Act," courts presume that "Congress acts intentionally and purposely in the disparate inclusion or exclusion"
  3. K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.

    486 U.S. 281 (1988)   Cited 806 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding a C.F.R. provision invalid because it conflicted with the unequivocal language of the statute
  4. Negusie v. Holder

    555 U.S. 511 (2009)   Cited 215 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Fedorenko's rule that voluntariness is irrelevant to culpability with respect to the DPA's persecutor bar need not be applied to the analogous INA persecutor bar
  5. Khan v. Holder

    584 F.3d 773 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 148 times
    Discussing differences between United States law and the Protocol
  6. Fong Yue Ting v. United States

    149 U.S. 698 (1893)   Cited 468 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the political branches could deport residents based solely on their race and deem all people of "the Chinese race" incompetent to sign the affidavit needed for Chinese immigrants to remain lawfully
  7. Abdisalan v. Holder

    774 F.3d 517 (9th Cir. 2014)   Cited 37 times
    Holding that in mixed decisions in which the Board affirms some decisions by the immigration judge but remands others for further consideration, "no final order of removal exists until all administrative proceedings have concluded"
  8. Sesay v. Attorney Gen.

    787 F.3d 215 (3d Cir. 2015)   Cited 33 times
    Holding that "carrying weapons and ammunition" is material support
  9. Annachamy v. Holder

    733 F.3d 254 (9th Cir. 2013)   Cited 28 times
    In Annachamy v. Holder, 733 F.3d 254, 267 (9th Cir. 2013), overruled in part on other grounds by Abdisalan v. Holder, 774 F.3d 517, 526 (9th Cir. 2015) (en banc), we held that "the material support bar does not include an implied exception for individuals" who give support to a terrorist organization while "under duress."
  10. Barahona v. Holder

    691 F.3d 349 (4th Cir. 2012)   Cited 28 times
    Upholding finding of material support because the alien, under threat, allowed terrorists to use his kitchen, gave them directions through the jungle, and occasionally allowed them to stay overnight
  11. Section 1158 - Asylum

    8 U.S.C. § 1158   Cited 10,675 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding a "pattern or practice" of persecution requires it be "systemic, pervasive, or organized"
  12. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,912 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"
  13. Section 1231 - Detention and removal of aliens ordered removed

    8 U.S.C. § 1231   Cited 7,961 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that once petitioner's removal order was reinstated, he was no longer eligible for "relief" in the form of adjustment of status-even if he could obtain a Form I-212 waiver
  14. Section 1208.17 - Deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture

    8 C.F.R. § 1208.17   Cited 399 times
    Stating that for an alien to be eligible for deferral of removal under the CAT, they must "ha[ve] been found under § 1208.16(c) to be entitled to protection under the Convention Against Torture"